Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Regulation EU 2019-1793

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic
- - - - -

sanidadexterior

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 52 posts
  • 6 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Murcia
  • Interests:contact : 10.3173@gmx.es

Posted 17 April 2025 - 10:15 AM

Can a pistachio that is to be imported and exceeds the maximum aflatoxin content be re-exported to the country of origin or must it be destroyed?

Recently, a consignment of Iranian pistachios underwent analytical control at the port of Valencia to determine its aflatoxin content, in accordance with EU Regulation 2019/1793.

An AFB1 content of >24 ppb was found, and it was rejected and ordered to be destroyed.

The importer disagreed and wanted to return the pistachio to Iran.

In the trial, the court ordered the product's re-shipment to Iran, finding that the pistachio did not pose a health risk.

Was the court ruling correct?

For more details, see the attached file.

 

Attached Files


Edited by sanidadexterior, 17 April 2025 - 10:18 AM.

  • 0

Karenconstable

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 97 posts
  • 40 thanks
13
Good

  • Australia
    Australia
  • Gender:Female

Posted 28 April 2025 - 01:12 AM

Thanks for sharing, Sanidad,

 

I was just writing today about the increasing food fraud vulnerabilities for pistachios due to the higher demand related to the sudden popularity of 'Dubai Chocolate' which contains pistachio.   That's 2025 news, by the way. 

 

I initially thought the border rejection described above was related to the recent increased demand for pistachios, since much of the pistachio used for Dubai Chocolate is sourced from Iran (source: https://www.foodnavi...achio-shortage/). 

 

However, for anyone else reading this, note that the case described by Sanidad relates to a shipment that was rejected in 2021. The dates are included  in the attachment they provided with their post.  Just FYI. 


  • 0

Regards,

Karen Constable

 

Food Fraud Prevention (VACCP) Programs | Food Fraud Training |

Consulting | Advisory | Compliance

The Rotten Apple Newsletter

 


sanidadexterior

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 52 posts
  • 6 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Murcia
  • Interests:contact : 10.3173@gmx.es

Posted 13 May 2025 - 11:40 AM

I was just writing today about the increasing food fraud vulnerabilities for pistachios due to the higher demand related to the sudden popularity of 'Dubai Chocolate' which contains pistachio.

This is a 2024 RASFF notification about dubai chocolate

 

 

RASFF Window - Notification detail

 

Rebards from Spain


  • 0

AZuzack

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 52 posts
  • 16 thanks
8
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 13 May 2025 - 12:43 PM

Allowing the product to return to the original Shipper is irresponsible.  Once the product leaves the control of the port, it can be shipped any where without traceability back to the original rejection.  Based on the current Pistachio prices and supply issues, I believe there is very little chance that the original shippers will do the "treatment" they claim.  


  • 0



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users