Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

SS 4.3-Non conformance

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Jean-C

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 36 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 06:59 PM

AnswerMinor: The site addressed High Care, Low Risk, enclosed product zones in their HACCP documentation and controls. However, the assessment performed by the site using the appendix 2 of the BRCGS standard is not available for review
As sown above, I recently had my yearly audit and was given a NC on SS:4.3 because I did not have the policy. I only had the Form 4 with all the risks zones highlighted.
Any suggestion on what to add to the preventative action?  I have already created the policy using the Appendix 2 but still having hard time coming up with an acceptable preventive action area to send to the reviewer.
Thanks  , All.

  • 0

Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 6,076 posts
  • 1642 thanks
1,833
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted Yesterday, 07:55 PM

Did you "retrain" yourself and the haccp team on the element requirement?


  • 0

Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


Jean-C

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 36 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 08:31 PM

No, I have not thought about this one; would this be a preventive action? If so, how do I retrain Myself?


  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,631 posts
  • 847 thanks
410
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted Today, 04:30 AM

I might or might not have got this right.  But I read that as you have risk zones on your site maps and HACCP plans but you've not recorded how you and the wider team came to that decision that those risk zones were the correct ones.  I'd simply have a HACCP meeting where you discuss that and record your assessment.  They used to have a flow diagram in the old standard you could record your outputs against but I think it caused confusion in some categories but the relevant section is appendix 2.  I'd make sure the areas are discussed and you record notes on your meeting "we agreed our area we've defined as high care is because.... [reference parts from app 2].  We agreed it was not High Risk because..." etc.

 

Does that make sense?


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,724 posts
  • 1400 thanks
770
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted Today, 05:35 AM

Hi Jean-C,

 

Assuming your HACCP team is responsible for this, I think this is as simple as:

Corrective Action: Assessment documented

Preventative Action: HACCP Team briefed with sign off & Assessment/Site Map off Zones added to list of documents reviewed during annual HACCP Review

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony

 


  • 0

IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 




Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users