- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Essentials
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More

SS 4.3-Non conformance
Started by Jean-C, Yesterday, 06:59 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted Yesterday, 06:59 PM
AnswerMinor: The site addressed High Care, Low Risk, enclosed product zones in their HACCP documentation and controls. However, the assessment performed by the site using the appendix 2 of the BRCGS standard is not available for review
As sown above, I recently had my yearly audit and was given a NC on SS:4.3 because I did not have the policy. I only had the Form 4 with all the risks zones highlighted.
Any suggestion on what to add to the preventative action? I have already created the policy using the Appendix 2 but still having hard time coming up with an acceptable preventive action area to send to the reviewer.
Thanks , All.
#3
Posted Yesterday, 08:31 PM
No, I have not thought about this one; would this be a preventive action? If so, how do I retrain Myself?
#4
Posted Today, 04:30 AM
I might or might not have got this right. But I read that as you have risk zones on your site maps and HACCP plans but you've not recorded how you and the wider team came to that decision that those risk zones were the correct ones. I'd simply have a HACCP meeting where you discuss that and record your assessment. They used to have a flow diagram in the old standard you could record your outputs against but I think it caused confusion in some categories but the relevant section is appendix 2. I'd make sure the areas are discussed and you record notes on your meeting "we agreed our area we've defined as high care is because.... [reference parts from app 2]. We agreed it was not High Risk because..." etc.
Does that make sense?
************************************************
25 years in food. And it never gets easier.
#5
Posted Today, 05:35 AM
Hi Jean-C,
Assuming your HACCP team is responsible for this, I think this is as simple as:
Corrective Action: Assessment documented
Preventative Action: HACCP Team briefed with sign off & Assessment/Site Map off Zones added to list of documents reviewed during annual HACCP Review
Kind regards,
Tony
IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009:
Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users