Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

BRCGS Certification with Excluded Scope and No Physical Segregation

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Apoorva Yogi

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 23 posts
  • 3 thanks
0
Neutral

  • New Zealand
    New Zealand

Posted 21 August 2025 - 01:27 AM

Is this possible to have brcgs with excluded scope. and there is no physical segregation of the building but only time and scheduling segregation. 


  • 0

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,192 posts
  • 1248 thanks
1,280
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Home now on Martha's Vineyard Island/Republic of these United States

Posted 21 August 2025 - 01:55 AM

I highly doubt this (as you described) would be allowed.

 

Now if there was physical separation - possible, however the area is still subject (just like with SQF) to inspection to ensure that there is nothing from that area that could impact on the area included in the certification (scope.)


  • 0

All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

 

 

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC 

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

http://glennoster.website3.me/  -- 774.563.6161

 

Accepting XRP, XLM, XDC & HBAR

 

 

BLOG

www.GlennOster.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,837 posts
  • 881 thanks
442
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 21 August 2025 - 03:56 AM

BRCGS have got very strict on scope exclusions. If you look at p100 of the standard it clearly sets out that it is not allowed unless "the products are produced in a physically segregated area of the factory". 

 

So in this instance I think it's totally clear, it cannot be excluded from scope if you are only segregating by time.

Why would you want to by the way?


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Apoorva Yogi

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 23 posts
  • 3 thanks
0
Neutral

  • New Zealand
    New Zealand

Posted 24 August 2025 - 11:37 PM

Oh the bakery is in the separate room from savory and RTE area. we only want BRCGS for the bakery not for savory and RTE meal. Only chilled and warehouse area area is shared . I did read some where that the time and schedule segregation will work . Most of the products are low risk and once a week it is high care products that is tiramisu and Kahlua dessert. 


  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,837 posts
  • 881 thanks
442
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 25 August 2025 - 06:57 AM

Oh the bakery is in the separate room from savory and RTE area. we only want BRCGS for the bakery not for savory and RTE meal. Only chilled and warehouse area area is shared . I did read some where that the time and schedule segregation will work . Most of the products are low risk and once a week it is high care products that is tiramisu and Kahlua dessert. 

 

Download the standard and look at p100.  Section 1.6.2 on that page.  It specifically says it must be "physically separated".  I'm unclear from your comment if that's the case because it starts off suggesting it is then refers to time and schedule segregation being allowed (which isn't under version 9).

 

If you have physical segregation, that's fine to the letter of the standard but if your reasoning for not including an area where higher risk products are made are "they may not pass" expect a thorough grilling on your food safety culture plan.  

 

If you have any open ingredients for those desserts in the same room as where you want to be approved, that won't be allowed under v9 to my understanding.  But feel free to contact your CB to ask.

 

Seeing as this is an area BRCGS has tightened up on repeatedly, I'd expect more tightening for v 10, if they allow it at all.


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.




Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users