Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

BRC V6 Position Statements - Guidance on some of the clauses

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Jayqc

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 22 posts
  • 18 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Location:uk

Posted 07 June 2012 - 03:29 PM

Hi all,

I've just come across this and thought I would share as I thought it could be useful/interesting. Its from the BRC site and it provides a little guidance on a few of the clauses in V6
Attached File  BRC guidance.pdf   653.71KB   361 downloads



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5666 thanks
1,546
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 07 June 2012 - 09:04 PM

Hi all,

I've just come across this and thought I would share as I thought it could be useful/interesting. Its from the BRC site and it provides a little guidance on a few of the clauses in V6
Attached File  BRC guidance.pdf   653.71KB   361 downloads


Dear Jayc,

Interesting stuff. Many thanks. (FPI, document is dated 8May 2012).

First time I hv seen a decision tree specifically for a metal detector. Seems to demand a risk assessment of how good consumers's are at spotting metal particles in/on their apples. Potential customers may include? :smile:

The absence of metal detection equipment cannot be justified on the basis of cost.

I suggest they should have included the word "solely" on.....

I wonder what the difference is between these selected items and the content in the Non-free "Guidelines" publication (not yet issued ?). Or are they included in it, ie this is a promotional tit-bit ?

Rgds / Charles.C

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


mellonz

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 10 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Turkey
    Turkey

Posted 12 June 2012 - 06:53 AM

thanks for the document! this can be quite useful actually!



Cravin' Cajun?

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 51 posts
  • 30 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Louisiana
  • Interests:Food Safety, HACCP, BRC, Spices

Posted 15 June 2012 - 05:39 PM

Thanks for sharing...I too am excited to finally have a decision tree to justify to management the absolute need for a metal detector in our process!



Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,250 posts
  • 1301 thanks
626
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 17 June 2012 - 03:02 PM

Thanks for that Jayqc,

The Decision Tree for Metal Detection is interesting.

Are there robust, effective systems of product inspection or controls of likely sources of metal?
(eg knife controls in place that prevent the risk of contamination and this is supported by the absence of metal complaints).


Although not a V6 audit I was in a position a few years ago where the organisation I worked for recieved a major non-compliance for lack of metal detection. I appealed to BRC and it was revoked on the basis of risk assessment, regular inspections of items like bolts & knives and a lack of metal complaints in historical data.

Regards,

Tony


Edyta

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 16 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Poland
    Poland

Posted 17 June 2012 - 03:47 PM

Hello, it is great file.

I will use it during my preparation according to BRC v.6

Thx :)





Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users