Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Due Dilligence


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 JohnLambert

JohnLambert

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 14 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

Posted 20 January 2004 - 02:43 PM

Where is the line dividing direct contact and secondary packaging. Who decides? Do apples etc. carry a natural barrier? Not everyone washes their apples before eating or cooking. Where do I stand if a customer uses our cases as primary packaging i.e. supermarket display without informing us of the purpose in advance. Are we legally bound to find this out in advance?


  • 0

#2 mikelond

mikelond

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 67 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral
  • Interests:Bass player - currently 2 bands on the go at once.<br />F1 motor racing - now the playing field is a little more level !!<br />Narrow boating

Posted 20 January 2004 - 04:15 PM

Not clear as to whether you are the producer of the packaging, or the supplier of the product within the packaging that may subsequently be used for other uses.
However, in both instances, my interpretation of the standard is that the category B rating (direct food contact) relates to the processes and production of the packaging itself, rather than the subsequent end use of it which, as you rightly point out, may be well out of your control further down the line. :unsure:

Hope this helps.

ML


  • 0

#3 Simon

Simon

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 11,421 posts
  • 1040 thanks
227
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Life, Family, Running, Cycling, Manager of a Football Team, Work, Watching Sport, The Internet, Food, Real Ale and Sleeping...

Posted 22 January 2004 - 08:52 AM

Do apples etc. carry a natural barrier? Not everyone washes their apples before eating or cooking.

No because people eat the skin of apples. Bananas I'd say have a natural barrier.

As part of the hazard analysis or HACCP study you should determine the 'intended use' for your products as far as you can and under normal circumstances. However, you cannot be expected to know all of your customers 'intended uses' and processes to the n'th degree and it is up to them to approve your material through samples / trials etc. for their particular product and process.

As long as your materials comply with relevant legislation [for intended use] and are within specification you are OK. I would say you are not legally bound to find out how a customer may use or misuse your products.

Similar to Mike really.

Regards,
Simon
  • 0

Best Regards,

Simon Timperley
IFSQN Administrator
 
hand-pointing-down.gif

Need food safety advice?
Relax, you've come to the right place…

The IFSQN is a helpful network of volunteers providing answers and support. Check out the forums and get free advice from the experts on food safety management systems and a wide range of food safety topics.

 
We could make a huge list of rules, terms and conditions, but you probably wouldn’t read them.

All that we ask is that you observe the following:


1. No spam, profanity, pornography, trolling or personal attacks

2. Topics and posts should be “on topic” and related to site content
3. No (unpaid) advertising
4. You may have one account on the board at any one time
5. Enjoy your stay!





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users