I know of a food distribution site which has had different answers from two environmental health officers about whether they need
HACCP; one said yes, the other said no. I would have said yes.
As it happens, they are moving chilled food so you can automatically identify a micro hazard. Also there is a pest control prerequisite in place.
It might be short but if you can identify any hazards in your system, you need
HACCP.
I don't know your process but here are some things you could consider:
Intake - hazard; presence of allegens due to product not being to supplier specification. Control measure; supplier quality assurance, suppliers have systems in place which are regularly audited to control allergens etc. You might require certificates of analysis for some ingredient hazards too. For some ingredients, the product might not be released until that CofA is checked and in spec in which case it might be a
CCP or an oPRP.
Storage - hazard; growth of pathogenic bacteria, e.g. Listeria monocytogenes, due to storage at elevated temperatures. Control measures would be around temperature (might be a
CCP), control of contamination at supplier sites etc.
HACCP is a worthwhile exercise and makes you consider your process and your controls. You shouldn't perhaps think about it this way but is worth the cost due to your ability to state a defence. I don't know if you recall the mouse found in a topic bar case in the UK? It was found to have come from a supplier site to Mars and because Mars had a supplier assurance scheme and their supplier hadn't told them about the pest control issues which had arisen; Mars were successful in their due diligence defence. If they'd not had a supplier assurance programme, they would have been liable. Supplier assurance is a prerequisite of
HACCP.