- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Essentials
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More
Looking for a Mock Recall Procedure for RTE Food Products
Started by akumar, Apr 06 2009 08:10 PM
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 06 April 2009 - 08:10 PM
Does anyone have any mock recall exercises for ready to eat products
#2
Posted 07 April 2009 - 01:45 AM
Dear Akumar,
The guidance from NZFSA seems quite suits for you:
http://www.nzfsa.gov...index.htm?print
There are some explanation how to conduct recall if the product is considered as RTE.
I notice this one too from San Diego Dept. of Environmental Health Food & Housing Division:
http://www.sdcounty....aleworkbook.pdf
Regards,
Arya
The guidance from NZFSA seems quite suits for you:
http://www.nzfsa.gov...index.htm?print
There are some explanation how to conduct recall if the product is considered as RTE.
I notice this one too from San Diego Dept. of Environmental Health Food & Housing Division:
http://www.sdcounty....aleworkbook.pdf
Regards,
Arya
IF
safety and quality means perfection
AND
nobody's perfect
THEN
why should I bother?
safety and quality means perfection
AND
nobody's perfect
THEN
why should I bother?
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
#3
Posted 07 April 2009 - 06:27 AM
Dear Arya,
Interesting documents (thks) but I couldn't see any information relating to mock recalls ?
I thought the example risk assessment in nzfa document was a good idea but I think their choice is very poorly explained. Makes no sense to talk about a "too high" pH without some numerics IMO. Similarly, the nzfa document links to a rather useful risk analysis form which well illustrates the subjectivity involved but at the same time 'cries' out for examples.
There are some other recent thread(s) on mock recall "somewhere" here.
Rgds / Charles.C
Interesting documents (thks) but I couldn't see any information relating to mock recalls ?
I thought the example risk assessment in nzfa document was a good idea but I think their choice is very poorly explained. Makes no sense to talk about a "too high" pH without some numerics IMO. Similarly, the nzfa document links to a rather useful risk analysis form which well illustrates the subjectivity involved but at the same time 'cries' out for examples.
There are some other recent thread(s) on mock recall "somewhere" here.
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
#4
Posted 08 April 2009 - 02:13 AM
Dear Charles C.,
Yups, indeed. Actually, finding some examples of "mock" recall is quite difficult for me. Most of them only explanations or templates. And the most interesting template that I found is the NZFSA one. I couldnt find the thread in here too. Care to help us, somebody?
I have an example for mock recall that conducted by our company. Though it seems I will need some time to alter and translate it.... Besides, mine is not RTE kind...
Regards,
Arya
Yups, indeed. Actually, finding some examples of "mock" recall is quite difficult for me. Most of them only explanations or templates. And the most interesting template that I found is the NZFSA one. I couldnt find the thread in here too. Care to help us, somebody?
I have an example for mock recall that conducted by our company. Though it seems I will need some time to alter and translate it.... Besides, mine is not RTE kind...
Regards,
Arya
Edited by a_andhika, 08 April 2009 - 05:17 AM.
IF
safety and quality means perfection
AND
nobody's perfect
THEN
why should I bother?
safety and quality means perfection
AND
nobody's perfect
THEN
why should I bother?
#6
Posted 08 April 2009 - 05:46 AM
Dear Biss,
That was the one I remembered. There may be others of course.
@Arya, yes, please translate it (into English preferably
)
Rgds / Charles.C
added - and here is another older one (also contained in the previous Biss link) -
http://www.ifsqn.com...?showtopic=6225
That was the one I remembered. There may be others of course.
@Arya, yes, please translate it (into English preferably
Rgds / Charles.C
added - and here is another older one (also contained in the previous Biss link) -
http://www.ifsqn.com...?showtopic=6225
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
#7
Posted 08 April 2009 - 11:33 AM
Dear Charles C.,
Am I just imagining, or your link is similar with Biss? Feel being challenged, I dare to spare my time in pursuing the webs. I hope these are "mock" enough:
http://edis.ifas.ufl.../FS/FS10800.pdf
(try page 139)
http://www.inspectio...ide.shtml#a2.10
(try the "testing your recall plan" section)
Sorry, I dont feel I am challenged enough for that one (am I just stepped into sore loser zone?)
Regards,
Arya
Am I just imagining, or your link is similar with Biss? Feel being challenged, I dare to spare my time in pursuing the webs. I hope these are "mock" enough:
http://edis.ifas.ufl.../FS/FS10800.pdf
(try page 139)
http://www.inspectio...ide.shtml#a2.10
(try the "testing your recall plan" section)
@Arya, yes, please translate it (into English preferably
Sorry, I dont feel I am challenged enough for that one (am I just stepped into sore loser zone?)
Regards,
Arya
IF
safety and quality means perfection
AND
nobody's perfect
THEN
why should I bother?
safety and quality means perfection
AND
nobody's perfect
THEN
why should I bother?
#8
Posted 08 April 2009 - 12:50 PM
Dear Arya,
Thks, you are absolutely correct, selected the wrong URL (empty stomach) while trying to present a complete list. Hv edited accordingly.
And thks for 2 more excellent links, particularly the first one. I guess, in practice, the first focus will be on sections (i) and (k).
Strangely, both procedures seem to hv omitted specifying an objective "time" for completing the traceability function or perhaps I missed it.
Rgds / Charles.C
added - No problem to avoid the translation. I can still remember interpreting organic chemical procedures from Beilstein (German ) into English. Agonising.
Am I just imagining, or your link is similar with Biss?
Thks, you are absolutely correct, selected the wrong URL (empty stomach) while trying to present a complete list. Hv edited accordingly.
And thks for 2 more excellent links, particularly the first one. I guess, in practice, the first focus will be on sections (i) and (k).
Strangely, both procedures seem to hv omitted specifying an objective "time" for completing the traceability function or perhaps I missed it.
Rgds / Charles.C
added - No problem to avoid the translation. I can still remember interpreting organic chemical procedures from Beilstein (German ) into English. Agonising.
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
#9
Posted 09 April 2009 - 12:16 PM
Akumar,
Here is a layout for a mock recall for you. An idea to fill in the blanks is Possible positive for L-Mono on product that has been released, or of course an allergen ingredient in product that it is not declared as an ingredient on the label. I hope this information is helpful. Good luck to you.
Here is a layout for a mock recall for you. An idea to fill in the blanks is Possible positive for L-Mono on product that has been released, or of course an allergen ingredient in product that it is not declared as an ingredient on the label. I hope this information is helpful. Good luck to you.
Attached Files
Arianna Tuel - Quality Control
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
#10
Posted 11 April 2011 - 08:41 PM
Sorry to bring bad news but it seems your first link is broken!
Regards.
Becky
[quote] name='a_andhika' timestamp='1239068739' post='28338']
Dear Akumar,
The guidance from NZFSA seems quite suits for you:
http://www.nzfsa.gov...index.htm?print
There are some explanation how to conduct recall if the product is considered as RTE.
I notice this one too from San Diego Dept. of Environmental Health Food & Housing Division:
http://www.sdcounty....aleworkbook.pdf
Regards,
Arya
[/quote]
Regards.
Becky
[quote] name='a_andhika' timestamp='1239068739' post='28338']
Dear Akumar,
The guidance from NZFSA seems quite suits for you:
http://www.nzfsa.gov...index.htm?print
There are some explanation how to conduct recall if the product is considered as RTE.
I notice this one too from San Diego Dept. of Environmental Health Food & Housing Division:
http://www.sdcounty....aleworkbook.pdf
Regards,
Arya
[/quote]
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












