Dear Titus,
Thks yr link although i think is identical to previous post ?
The sample risk analyses offered on the site are certainly interesting however they do not seem to contain any explanation as to the reason for the actual likelihood / severity numbers which are given in the tables.
eg for herbs pg 9/12
why is the seriousness for dioxins 3 but polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 2 ? (I guess the net result is not too important since the only
CCP is pesticides ) !
I quite like the Dutch
HACCP risk structure but it seems to have a very limited user base globally (?). I am also not entirely clear how it matches the other GFSI "equivalently" rated standards like BRC in respect to the
HACCP content.
Rgds / Charles.C
BTW - Welcome to the forum !
@ Sunflower - many thks for yr help also !