How are some of you meeting this requirement? Will a review of recent developments on a pre-determined basis qualify as a "system"?
Thanks in advance for the replies.
Nate
Posted 06 January 2011 - 09:30 PM
Posted 07 January 2011 - 09:45 AM
Posted 07 January 2011 - 03:48 PM
Oddly enough I have just posted a reply to a very similar question on the BRC Packaging forum.
If your company is very large, there could be a department doing this, but for most small to medium sized companies it is normally left to the Technical or Quality Manager.
The BRC Interpretation Guidelines give some examples of information sources- Trade Associations, subscription sources, agents or identified websites. The important thing is to be able to prove to the auditor that you proactively use these sources, so you need to have a file or record of extracted information which is related to your products.
Of course if you identify an issue which may have an impact on your products, you need to take appropriate action.
For example, recalls for allergen problems are constantly being reported and detection techniques and operating practices are getting better more and detailed.
Being able to demonstrate that you have identified a current issue, evaluated its relevance to you and acted accordingly is what this clause is intending to achieve.
Posted 07 January 2011 - 04:21 PM
************************************************
25 years in food. And it never gets easier.
Posted 07 January 2011 - 07:04 PM
I've just replied to a similar thread.
The FSA www.food.gov.uk and the FDA both have email alert systems which could help towards fullfilling this requirement.
Posted 08 January 2011 - 09:18 AM
Posted 11 January 2011 - 09:27 PM
Posted 13 January 2011 - 03:46 AM
Posted 14 January 2011 - 12:53 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users