Dear Quasim Abbasi,
Frankly, I think Simon’s earlier response was the most useful reply and should suffice in a real situation. Clearly a successful audit for ISO22000 should imply the implementation of a satisfactory (Codex?) HACCP system.
We are probably at the moment only arguing over semantics.
I believe claiming certification to a standard demands possession of a certificate naming that standard. Clearly you disagree. No problem.
Within the literature, it is easy to find all kinds of usages (misusages?) of the various terminologies involved, eg -
(a) HACCP is a system - ISO 22000 is a standard. ISO 22000 can be used to measure the success of a company's implementation of HACCP, as well as pre-requsites to HACCP and quality systems. There are other standards that can also be used - ISO 22000 is not the only one.
(b) [Compare to (a)] By 1997, the seven HACCP principles listed below became the [HACCP] standard.
http://en.wikipedia...._control_points
© There is no internationally recognized auditing standard for HACCP and while all seven HACCP principles are included in the ISO 22000 standard, HACCP can be implemented as a separate risk management system, or as part of a certification to ISO 9000.
(d)….. HACCP certification will generally be against the requirements of the Codex Alimentarius Basic Food Hygiene Tests, however this is not an internationally recognized standard for auditing , as in the same way as ISO standards. Therefore depending on country and geographical area, many certification and regulatory bodies will certificate against their own HACCP standard, which generally is based around the Codex HACCP principles.
http://www.standards...s/listing/haccp
I anticipate that anyone who does request an approved HACCP Certificate after an audit for ISO22000 will not see any reference to an ISO HACCP standard on the certificate. But perhaps i am wrong ??
Rgds / Charles.C