is "handling of unsafe product" part of the "corrections"?
My point is for example, when i pasteurise milk and i exceed the critical limits i have a "correction" - re-pasteurise it. so is that the step? or i should say that i should "handle the unsafe branch of milk that exceeded the CL ( test it,identify it, store it, labe it etc) and then i should apply the "correction" in this brach of milk?
or should i first do the "correction" and then "handle the potentially unsafe branch of milk" until i test it and identify if it is safe or not and destroy it or sell it?
ISO 22000 standard treated both processes as separate under different clauses (7.10.1 and 7.10.3). As you have stated in your own post
"when i pasteurise milk and i exceed the critical limits i have a "correction" - re-pasteurise it". Yes, this is logically a correction process. Then
"handle the unsafe branch of milk that exceeded the CL ( test it,identify it, store it, label it etc)" is the process of handling of potentially unsafe product.
The confusion arise while executing these processes in actual situation. Since ISO 22000 is a generic standard applicable to all type of food industries, it would be logical to define these processes separate. IMO, the correction process is usually performed during handling of potentially unsafe product that's why people generally consider correction process as part of handling of unsafe product.
IMO the usual sequence of activities performed when a non conformance is identified are:
1- Separate and identified storage of potentially unsafe product/material
2- Evaluation (Inspection / testing)
3- Separate and identified storage of evaluated product / material
4- Correction, if required.
5- Disposition / Release
6- Corrective Action, if assessed as necessary.
Regards:
M.Zeeshan
Edited by Zeeshan, 30 November 2011 - 05:55 AM.