6 replies to this topic

[stsqf]

File Name: Example Policy Manual (SQF)
File Submitter: stsqf
File Submitted: 21 Feb 2011
File Category: Food Safety & Quality Manuals

This is a template for a Policy Manual to fulfill SQF requirement - essentially serves as a summary of your food safety management system.



Click here to download this file

[Tony-C]

The IFSQN SQF Food Safety Management System for Food Manufacturers can be found be found here http://www.ifsqn.com...urers-p-99.html

 

Charles.C-250218 / Old Link. See the Current "Store" Tab.

Amongst many other useful tools in this package you will see that there are 68 food safety management system document templates that are aligned with the SQF Code Edition 7 for ease of implementation.

[Hoosiersmoker]

Is this policy manual sample still valid for SQF? Do i just need to add the Food Fraud section?

[Charles.C]

Is this policy manual sample still valid for SQF? Do i just need to add the Food Fraud section?

 

5-year old thread ?

[Hoosiersmoker]

5 year old thread still live contained in the files offered as a resource. I would imagine if the resources were incorrect, out of date or otherwise irrelevant they would be removed at such a time that became known, wouldn't they?

[Charles.C]

5 year old thread still live contained in the files offered as a resource. I would imagine if the resources were incorrect, out of date or otherwise irrelevant they would be removed at such a time that became known, wouldn't they?

 

Hi HS,

 

"Not Useful" is a relative term. Think Libraries ?

 

Some Forums have a Policy to close threads if "inactive". This one doesn't. I guess it's a "judgement call".

[Charles.C]

addendum

 

Is this policy manual sample still valid for SQF? Do i just need to add the Food Fraud section?

 

The only way to know is presumably to compare the SQF Standard Code version associated with the uploaded file (?? XYZ)  to the current version of Standard (SQF8 XYZ).

 

There are gap analyses available for each new version as compared to previous one but not cumulative ones afaik. Offhand, I'm not sure how many versions have filled the time period involved.

So significant comparison effort probably required. I doubt that it's viable.

 

It may depend on what style of Policy Manual you are seeking but IMO the re-engineeering approach, albeit inelegant, reliably minimises effort/time.