Dear baron,
Thanks and nice to see you are posting again.
This sop must be one of the shortest on record.
I deduce from yr definitions that SQF are still clinging to their quirky concept of Validation.
Rgds / Charles.C
Yes, I know, SQF messed things up a wee bit.
However, apart from saying "Its
fluid dynamics man!" (i.e. - a one ounce swallow cannot carry a one pound coconut!) as a way of "validating" Back-flow prevention.
Technically, even according to
Codex Alimentarius' definitions: "
Obtained evidence (an actual water system pressure test) that a control measure (daily monitoring or monthly checking), if properly implemented, is capable of controlling the hazard to a specified outcome" ... I think I will have more to post on Ver/Val later on the old thread:
Interpretation of Validation/VerificationAnd to comment on Tony-C, agreed, as I have done, a grid/table in a spreadsheet is the a the most effective way to present a summary.
Cheers