Can someone tell me the differences with 2.3.2 Raw and Packaging Material VS 2.4.5 Incoming Goods and Services? It looks like they mostly cover the same thing.
Thanks in advance,
AA
Posted 21 November 2012 - 01:05 AM
Posted 21 November 2012 - 05:34 PM
|
Thanked by 1 Member:
|
|
Posted 31 October 2013 - 06:33 AM
Hi!
Can someone tell me the differences with 2.3.2 Raw and Packaging Material VS 2.4.5 Incoming Goods and Services? It looks like they mostly cover the same thing.
Thanks in advance,
AA
As Esquef has indicated, here is a brief summary:
2.3.2 Raw and Packaging Materials
Materials should comply with legislation, be approved and validated. Documented specifications and a register of materials should be available.
2.4.5 Incoming Goods and Services
There should be an approved supplier program for organisations supplying raw materials, ingredients, packaging materials, and services. Supplier performance should be monitored. There should be a register of approved supplier and records of inspections and audits.
Regards,
Tony
Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations Now available via the recording of the Webinar on Friday 5th December 2025.
Suitable for Internal Auditors as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.
IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009:
Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams available via the recording until the next live webinar.
Suitable for food safety (HACCP) team members as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.
Posted 02 June 2014 - 06:09 PM
Posted 15 January 2015 - 04:05 PM
I'm new here, and new to SQF after being thrust into this new role for our company, and so maybe I've just been reading and digesting way too much to be able to think straight at this point (haha), but I could use some expertise relevant to this thread.
What exactly is meant by "level of risk" and where is that documented/found? Specifically, we had a Desk/Gap Audit performed recently (I think I'm using those terms properly) and were found to be "non-compliant" in Clause "2.4.5.4 - Incoming Goods & Services" and the note we were given says the following...
"There is no reference to the rating of the level of risk."
What exactly does that mean!?! Again, please excuse me if this seems like a rather ridiculous question.
Are we supposed to assign/create a "Risk Level" to EACH AND EVERY Raw Material Specification Sheet and all the Specification Sheets we have for each product we create in-house or is this something else entirely? Could it be as simple as adding a single sentence or two to become compliant perhaps?
What is meant by the statement provided to us so we know what our proper response should be?
Thanks in advance for your time and help!
All The Best,
Jeff
Swimming In An Alphabet Soup of SQF Acronyms, Code, & Clauses!
"You do SQF Level 2 because your customers demand it. You do SQF Level 3 for yourselves, because you see the value in improving your systems and extending the philosophy and practices in SQF to other aspects of your business, beyond Food Safety." Anonymous
Posted 15 January 2015 - 04:12 PM
Could it be as simple as us adding a statement here that references our "Approved Suppliers & Verification Program" in SQF Clause 2.4.5.4 and the "Approved Supplier/Vendor Questionnaire" we use for all potential new Suppliers/Vendors that asks all the pertinent questions that directly relate to the "risk level" presented?
I'm hoping it's that easy and I'm just confusing myself over something really simple b/c I'm reaching "burnout stage" as it typical at the end of another long week working on SQF (haha!).
Thanks,
Jeff
Swimming In An Alphabet Soup of SQF Acronyms, Code, & Clauses!
"You do SQF Level 2 because your customers demand it. You do SQF Level 3 for yourselves, because you see the value in improving your systems and extending the philosophy and practices in SQF to other aspects of your business, beyond Food Safety." Anonymous
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users