Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

SQF 11.2.10.3 - Protection of calibrated equipment


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

cheeseman

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 10 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madison, WI

Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:57 PM

Has anyone had any experience with this specific part of the code? We're working on development of this program but weren't sure how to go about "protecting" calibrated equipment. Do we need only worry about protecting CCPs or are we supposed to address all equipment?



cheeseman

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 10 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madison, WI

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:00 PM

Specifically, protected from unauthorized adjustment.



esquef

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 374 posts
  • 234 thanks
40
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:03 PM

Specifically, protected from unauthorized adjustment.


I'd have to interpret that as CCP related equipment (metal detectors, etc).


cheeseman

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 10 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madison, WI

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:12 PM

And that was acceptable to the auditor?



Marshenko

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 266 posts
  • 105 thanks
40
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:10 PM

Just like it says ... how do you protect the equipment from unauthorized adjustment?

For our metal detector, for instance, it has an operator password and a technician password, and only the technician can actually change phase/sensitivity/etc settings within the machine, while the operator is allowed only to switch between products. Only one person here knows the technician password - me, so unless they are doing some hacking, I am assured that no one who is not authorized is changing sensitivity settings within the machine.



SpursGirl

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 117 posts
  • 79 thanks
26
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:PA

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:11 PM

Hi Cheeseman


For my metal detector I have passwords on the equipment that allows access to the control panel. Only authorised operatives are given the password and these people are trained and authorised to adjust the program.


For other things like thermometers and pH meters there is nothing practical to be done in protecting from adjustment.


That is what I shall be saying in my upcoming SQF audit (5th March) - I will let you know if that flies with the auditor!



Kind regards,



Sarah


Edited by SpursGirl, 18 February 2013 - 06:11 PM.


Marshenko

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 266 posts
  • 105 thanks
40
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:49 PM

Hi Cheeseman


For my metal detector I have passwords on the equipment that allows access to the control panel. Only authorised operatives are given the password and these people are trained and authorised to adjust the program.


For other things like thermometers and pH meters there is nothing practical to be done in protecting from adjustment.


That is what I shall be saying in my upcoming SQF audit (5th March) - I will let you know if that flies with the auditor!



Kind regards,



Sarah


For equipment like thermometers, meters, etc., although you can never fully protect against unauthorized adjustment, you can limit the possibility by:
a. keeping them locked up when not in use
b. providing regular access to only trained, responsible individuals
c. scheduling calibration verification at regular intervals to ensure they are still properly calibrated

Just a thought.


cheeseman

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 10 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Madison, WI

Posted 18 February 2013 - 08:03 PM

Thanks for the input Sarah and Marshenko! Like each of you said, the critical equipment shouldn't be a problem to regulate (metal detector, htst equipment). It's the everyday equipment that is used constantly throughout the day (thermometers, ph meters, pipettes) that don't seem realistic to lock up.



SpursGirl

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 117 posts
  • 79 thanks
26
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:PA

Posted 19 February 2013 - 01:40 PM

For equipment like thermometers, meters, etc., although you can never fully protect against unauthorized adjustment, you can limit the possibility by:
a. keeping them locked up when not in use
b. providing regular access to only trained, responsible individuals
c. scheduling calibration verification at regular intervals to ensure they are still properly calibrated

Just a thought.



We work 24/7 so locking up thermometers is not really practical and we are a small factory so access cannot be limited to certain areas or individuals.

We do weekly calibrations - that is a good point that I will bring up at the audit.



Thank you!


Mr. Incognito

    "Mostly Harmless"

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,571 posts
  • 270 thanks
127
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 February 2013 - 06:21 PM

For tools and instruments look to see if where the adjustment is if a paper adhesive seal can be placed on/over it maybe. Like the tamper proof seal type thing then you would know if someone changed it because it would be broke.

Not sure if that's feasible but it's just an idea.


____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Mr. Incognito


:tardis:

Mr. Incognito is a cool frood who can travel the width and breadth of the galaxy and still know where his towel is.

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,781 posts
  • 950 thanks
843
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:American Patriot
    WWG1WGA
    Never give up, never give in - always win!
    Martha's Vineyard Island, Massachusetts

Posted 21 February 2013 - 10:40 PM

Has anyone had any experience with this specific part of the code? We're working on development of this program but weren't sure how to go about "protecting" calibrated equipment. Do we need only worry about protecting CCPs or are we supposed to address all equipment?



Yes, I have experience with this section of the code -- very simple, you need to protect all equipment that can be "calibrated". Show it in writing and prove it in action. Thus for instance you might store all of your stick thermometers under lock in the QA department, or your PH meter equipment may be passcode protected, or your metal detector requires a code to test/check/re-calibrate, etc.

So run a check on what items you have that require calibration and then go about writing your documentation on it and implement same.



Glenn Oster

http://www.GetGoc.com

Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC BUSINESS GROUP | SQF System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
Internal Auditor Training - eConsultant Retainer Subscriptions - Pre & Post SQF-GAP Audits - Consultant Training
Visit us @ http://www.GlennOster.com  or call us @ 772.646.4115 US-EST 8am-4pm Anyday except Thursday
 
 




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users