Dear hygienic,
Perhaps I should hv been more numerically cautious
. From memory, comments in other threads on this forum imply that the Netherlands do not accept food products which have been processed in contact with water where microbiological safety is achieved through maintaining a residual chlorine level.
The Netherlands drinking water supply apparently relies on chemicals such as ozone. The logic / methodology is detailed here (also see attachment ch5) –
ch1 - safe drinking water without chlorine in the Netherlands, 2009.pdf 1.06MB
11 downloads
A typical general reservation regarding use of chlorine/ related chemicals is due to DBPs , Disinfection By-Products. For example this extract from attachment ch4 –
ch2 - Chlorination DBPs.png 116.66KB
0 downloads
ch4 - Risk assessment of disinfection byproducts in poultry chilled in chlorinated water, Najjar,2009.pdf 226.9KB
10 downloads
I also noticed this (2003, current validity unknown) comment from attachment ch3 on a similar activity elsewhere –
Water used to chill carcasses could contain chlorine (20 ppm for spray washing and between 20 and 50 ppm in the chilling tank) "in order to facilitate the reduction of total microbiological loads" (NCC, 1992). The amount of chlorine added to the intake water should be sufficient to achieve 1 to 5 ppm available chlorine at the chiller overflow. This practice is not authorized in the European food industries for which only potable drinking water must be used in the contact of foods (Council Directive 71/118/EC)
ch3 - EC draft opinion - the evaluation of antimicrobial treatments for poultry carcasses, 2003.pdf 724.26KB
6 downloads
The actual implementations in the EC’s constituent countries suggest a wide variety of (sometimes multiple ) opinions –
ch5 - DRINKING WATER DISINFECTION USING CHLORINE, theory and practice, Casey 2009 -.pdf 98.13KB
9 downloads
Rgds / Charles.C