Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Part A 5.03 of SQF code 7


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 ChrisO

ChrisO

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 6 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 03 October 2013 - 09:54 PM

Just wrapped up level 3 cert audit. Auditor documented major non-conformance due to comnpany receiving a regualtory warning letter in early 2013. Per Part A 5.03 of Edition 7.1 suppliers are required to report any warning letetrs as well as class 1 & 2 recall to the cert body. Discussed the fact that edition 7.1 was not effective until 7/1/13 post receipt of the warning letter. Auditor's stance is that Edition 7 was interpreted to include warning letters as a "regulatory infringement".

Curious if anyone familiar with Edition 7 interpreted this clause to mean that any regulatory infringement other than class 1 & 2 recalls required notification of cert body?



#2 Tony-C

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,361 posts
  • 992 thanks
263
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Koh Samui
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 04 October 2013 - 06:46 AM

Well done on achieving level 3 certification Chris :clap:

 

Regards,

 

Tony



#3 Snookie

Snookie

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,625 posts
  • 267 thanks
171
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 04 October 2013 - 03:37 PM

Just wrapped up level 3 cert audit. Auditor documented major non-conformance due to comnpany receiving a regualtory warning letter in early 2013. Per Part A 5.03 of Edition 7.1 suppliers are required to report any warning letetrs as well as class 1 & 2 recall to the cert body. Discussed the fact that edition 7.1 was not effective until 7/1/13 post receipt of the warning letter. Auditor's stance is that Edition 7 was interpreted to include warning letters as a "regulatory infringement".

Curious if anyone familiar with Edition 7 interpreted this clause to mean that any regulatory infringement other than class 1 & 2 recalls required notification of cert body?

The standard says, " Upon identification that a certified supplier initiates a food safety event that  requires public notification (such as a Class 1 or Class II recall)....   While warning letters are often public, they aren't always nor do they necessarily require public notification.   Did the warning letter require public notification?  If the warning letter was still being dealt with then think it is a gray area, however if you had already resolved the issue before the code took effect, think auditor is being overly stringent. 


Posted Image
Live Long & Prosper

#4 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,073 posts
  • 782 thanks
648
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Truth is like a delicious slice of watermelon... you just want more and more!

Posted 08 October 2013 - 09:49 PM

So, I'm not getting this Chris. If I read what you wrote correctly you just went thru your FIRST certification audit in September or October of 2013 and this warning letter you received was before you were an SQF "certified" supplier?

 

If that is the case, the Auditor is wrong.


Kind regards,

 

Glenn Oster
 
 
GOC GROUP / +1.800.793.7042 / Food - Food Packaging - Food Storage/3PL

SQF, BRC & IFS System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants

Serving Small-to-Large Businesses | International Cross-Border Acceptance

Auditor Training | eConsultant | GFCP | 50% Reduction for C-Currencies

http://www.GlennOsterConsulting.com  -- 

 

 

SQF, BRC & IFS System Developments - it's what we do everyday!

https://glennosterco...-development-pr

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

EV SSL Certificate