Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Corporate documents vs Local documents on Smoking

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Mr. Incognito

    "Mostly Harmless"

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,571 posts
  • 272 thanks
131
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 November 2013 - 08:19 PM

Here is my situation.

 

We have a coporate GMP policy that states "Our mills are smoke free enviroments"

 

Our mill, one of the 5 coporate mills for our food sector, allows smoking in a designated location for a reason that plant manager has explained to corporate and has recieved an unhappy "OK".

 

I brought up this inconsistancy at our last food safety team meeting.  We don't want to write another GMP document for multple reasons but we want something that reflects that we do allow smoking at our mill as apposed to the corporate document that says that we don't as a blanket statement.

 

Within FFSC22000 what is the easest way to accomplish this?


  • 0
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Mr. Incognito


:tardis:

Mr. Incognito is a cool frood who can travel the width and breadth of the galaxy and still know where his towel is.

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,632 posts
  • 1384 thanks
747
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 19 November 2013 - 04:30 PM

Here is my situation.

 

We have a coporate GMP policy that states "Our mills are smoke free enviroments"

 

Our mill, one of the 5 coporate mills for our food sector, allows smoking in a designated location for a reason that plant manager has explained to corporate and has recieved an unhappy "OK".

 

I brought up this inconsistancy at our last food safety team meeting.  We don't want to write another GMP document for multple reasons but we want something that reflects that we do allow smoking at our mill as apposed to the corporate document that says that we don't as a blanket statement.

 

Within FFSC22000 what is the easest way to accomplish this?

 

As always in this situation there is still going to be a contradiction. I assume that the corporate GMP 'policy' covers a multitude of areas that you are ok with and that this is the exception. If this is the case I would add a 'local smoking policy' which is signed by the person with highest authority on site as an 'appendix' and ensure the controls are in place to eliminate any food safety hazards related to smoking. An auditor may not like the conflict with corporate policy but if you are enforcing your own rules and there isn't any risk then you should be okay.

 

Regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams - Live Webinar next Friday May 09, 2025

Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. 

Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 

Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages: 

:cheers: 

 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Live Webinar - Friday June 06, 2025 - Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here


Thanked by 1 Member:

Mr. Incognito

    "Mostly Harmless"

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,571 posts
  • 272 thanks
131
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 November 2013 - 04:44 PM

I was leaning toward this type of resolution I just wasn't sure if it would fly in general with an auditor.

 

Thanks Tony


  • 0
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Mr. Incognito


:tardis:

Mr. Incognito is a cool frood who can travel the width and breadth of the galaxy and still know where his towel is.

mgourley

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,434 posts
  • 1015 thanks
282
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Plant City, FL
  • Interests:Cooking, golf, firearms, food safety and sanitation.

Posted 20 November 2013 - 02:22 AM

As long as you have something in the "Corporate Policy" that allows satellite organizations leeway, and the local policy addresses it.. that should be fine.

 

Marshall


  • 0



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users