Dear tech,
i do not see any reference to the final presentation. I hv assumed frozen. Otherwise is a different ball-park, as per various previous caveats .
The necessary control strictness of yr overall line from input to frozen may relate to the finished product micro. spec. A considerable range of micro. values for non zero-tolerant items can still equate to a safe product, for example i hv seen target APC specs range from 10^3 to 10^5 cfu/gram. Some raw materials / processes will not accommodate all that range IMEX.
I hv no RTE experience with pots (only plastic bags / boxes) but i would personally have hoped that the container would be in satisfactory micro. condition before filling, ie hot/cold filling not related to safety of finished product.? a question of specifications / numbers.
Offhand, as per GMO, a "unified" mix of product condition sounds more logical to me.
As already noted, the hot/cold rice factor could be related to the associated micro.conditions / hygiene of handling / cumulative times involved / freezing capability to reach ca.-18degC (??)
I assume an adequate control of the typical micro. sensitive inputs/removals/neutralizers such as raw material / cooking, rapid filling/transit system / temperature control into a running blast freezer, ideally a continuous set-up.
We don't have a refrigerated packing area.
I guess it might depend on what you mean by "refrigerated", eg the ambient temperature?.
IMEX (not in freezing UK), this is very unusual for a frozen / chilled RTE/ "IQF" product (??).
Would require to be haccp T/t justifiable.
The proof of all the above adequacies relates to regulatory / customer / specifications / "data". 
Rgds / Charles.C