Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Supplier Quality Assurance - Third Party Audit Info

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

HACCPCOR

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 19 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 10 January 2014 - 04:15 PM

Hi All,

 

We always request suppliers to provide us with their third part audit certifcation.

However when suppliers do not have any third party audit certifications, according to BRC Ive noticed that we can then do our own supplier audit or else provide a supplier questionnaire is this correct.

If so does anyone have any ideas as to what I would include in this questionnaire, and really is it sufficent?

 

Thanks


  • 0

bacon

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 173 posts
  • 77 thanks
18
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:NOAA HACCP & Better Process Control School Certified, GFSI Schemes (BRC/SQF) Certified, Woolworths Quality Assurance (WQA), USDC, FDA, U.S. Army and client audit preparation; Seafood Processing, Supplier Approval

Posted 13 January 2014 - 12:49 AM

A questionnaire is one method and legitimate method for BRC. However...

 

 

If so does anyone have any ideas as to what I would include in this questionnaire, and really is it sufficient?

 

In principle, the higher the risk, the more requirements to "assure" one of a supplier's safety and quality. Risk can be based upon a number factors (food/ingredient type, history of food and the supplier recalls in the past (if any), their processing method, your further processing method, environmental factors, etc).

 

The key here is to develop a method to reduce exposure (like the retailers are trying to do) to food safety and quality events (and their life threatening and/or financial costs). 

 

For example, if one is processing vegetables, think about Taylor Farms supplying you spinach (and their recent recall history and the end R-T-E product) vs. Simplot raw potatoes that will be further processed with a kill step.  One will be a different risk than the other, one should require more to "assure" you of their safety than the other. These risks would guide the questions you would ask (the former just may be too risky for an questionnaire approval than the latter).

 

I hope this helps some.

Cheers 

 

 


  • 0
____________________________________________________
><((((º> Salmon of Doubt & NOAA HACCP lover of Bacon

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,632 posts
  • 1384 thanks
747
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 15 January 2014 - 03:27 AM

Hi All,

 

We always request suppliers to provide us with their third part audit certifcation.

However when suppliers do not have any third party audit certifications, according to BRC Ive noticed that we can then do our own supplier audit or else provide a supplier questionnaire is this correct.

If so does anyone have any ideas as to what I would include in this questionnaire, and really is it sufficent?

 

Thanks

 

Hi there,

 

What is required is dependent on risk of what is supplied, the associated hazards and if there are controls in your process that remove the hazards.

Attached File  Supplier Categories for Risk Assessment.jpg   66.63KB   7 downloads

 

If you do have time then you could consider three types of questionnaire based on the BRC standard, high/medium/low risk but I'll think that you will find that certification or an audit will be required for high risk materials/services.

 

Regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams - Live Webinar next Friday May 09, 2025

Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. 

Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 

Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages: 

:cheers: 

 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Live Webinar - Friday June 06, 2025 - Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here


DP2006

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 65 posts
  • 21 thanks
4
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 January 2014 - 10:15 AM

HACCPCOR,

 

Depending on the nature of your processes / products and other factors eg if you are operating a positive release process on incoming ingredients (whereby you are testing incoming deliveries of ingredients / raw materials .....if possible and practicable!), at the end of the day a failure in your supplier quality assurance could result in serious damage to your business eg claims due to food safety failure or even business closure.

 

On this basis, you need to demonstrate appropriate "due diligence" in your Supplier Quality Assurance (SQA) process, as a minimum.

 

As highlighted in the other posts what you do will vary depending on risk and this could mean carrying out 3rd Party SQA audits. You might also find some customers eg supermarkets require that SQA audits are carried out.

 

If you don't have the resources to do this yourself, you could consider using an independent 3rd party auditor to carry out your audits at "high" risk suppliers.

 

Good luck!

DP2006


  • 0

Peter Snopko

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 35 posts
  • 13 thanks
1
Neutral

  • New Zealand
    New Zealand
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Art, sailing, woodwork, passion for all things packaging,
    great food and non-Beige people.
    My humour is similar to Billy C.

Posted 16 January 2014 - 04:56 AM

If you are sourcing food contact (primary) packaging items then you need to be sure that the vendor poses no risk to your products.

 

Secondary and tertiary packaging items are less of a risk but can still be an issue and need to included in your programme but at lower level of frequency and intensity.

 

If you vendor does not get a quality and food safety audit conducted by recognised agency, then do your own.

If you are having repeated quality issues with the vendor then send in your own or a 3rd party auditor.

Hope this helps


  • 0
Peter Snopko
Packaging Specialist
Packaging Resources & Development Ltd
Cambridge, New Zealand
www.prd.net.nz
Ph: +64 21 813259



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users