Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Do Enforcement Officers have to adhere to the plant hygiene rules?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic
- - - - -

trubertq

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 658 posts
  • 281 thanks
137
Excellent

  • Ireland
    Ireland
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Donegal

Posted 26 May 2014 - 06:48 PM

Can I ask  as a point of information, are enforcement officers, of any description, allowed to enter a processing plant without adhering to any of the hygiene rules attendant to that processing plant?

 

I'm just asking in case it would ever happen which is unlikely.........


I'm entitled to my opinion, even a stopped clock is right twice a day

Quality Ben

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 85 posts
  • 16 thanks
7
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Food Safety, Quality, Laboratory, Technical Issues, Water Activity and Migration, VITAL, Allergens, Fresh Produce, Post Harvest, Cold Smoked Fish, Non Pasteurised Caviar, Cook/Chill, Listeria Hunting & Eradication/Environmental monitoring programs, Small-Goods, HACCP, Continuous Improvement, Problem Solving, Risk Mitigation, Listeria.spp., High Risk, Chemistry, Cleaning and Sanitation, Biosecurity, Consultancy, Training, Process Control



    Food Safety = Science + Culture

Posted 26 May 2014 - 07:46 PM

No.

All visitors / contractors etc must adhere to site policies.

:)



mapry2

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 92 posts
  • 28 thanks
4
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 May 2014 - 07:47 PM

A big NO



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5666 thanks
1,546
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 26 May 2014 - 09:22 PM

Out of curiosity. another point of information -

 

would this include a face mask ?

 

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Quality Ben

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 85 posts
  • 16 thanks
7
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Food Safety, Quality, Laboratory, Technical Issues, Water Activity and Migration, VITAL, Allergens, Fresh Produce, Post Harvest, Cold Smoked Fish, Non Pasteurised Caviar, Cook/Chill, Listeria Hunting & Eradication/Environmental monitoring programs, Small-Goods, HACCP, Continuous Improvement, Problem Solving, Risk Mitigation, Listeria.spp., High Risk, Chemistry, Cleaning and Sanitation, Biosecurity, Consultancy, Training, Process Control



    Food Safety = Science + Culture

Posted 26 May 2014 - 09:26 PM

Out of curiosity. another point of information -

 

would this include a face mask ?

 

Rgds / Charles.C

I would think it would - if face masks were standard for all employees and the areas entered. Our hygiene policy (PPE, sanitation etc) applies to all persons who enter that particular area..... except some specific PPE that is dependant on what you will be doing in that area. 



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5666 thanks
1,546
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 26 May 2014 - 09:33 PM

except some specific PPE that is dependant on what you will be doing in that area.

 

 

Nice one.

 

O lucky Engineers. :smile:

 

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

cazyncymru

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • Banned
  • 1,604 posts
  • 341 thanks
130
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 May 2014 - 09:46 AM

To be honest the only people I would allow into a production area without donning "company issue" PPE are the fire brigade or a paramedic, whilst they are carrying out their duties.

 

Royalty , dignitaries & MP's will be required to wear what the rest of us are wearing!

 

Your local EHO / TSO will be (should be) more than happy to don PPE

 

Caz



Thanked by 2 Members:

trubertq

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 658 posts
  • 281 thanks
137
Excellent

  • Ireland
    Ireland
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Donegal

Posted 27 May 2014 - 09:56 AM

Thanks ever so, that was my instinct but I wanted some back-up lest the issue ever arose. It was one of those conversations that lead to 'what if'.... and everyone turned and looked at me.....

 

 

By the way...retained the A grade with only 5 NC's!! Thanks indeed to information I have gained here over the years.  :rock:  :happydance:  :giggle:


Edited by trubertq, 27 May 2014 - 09:57 AM.

I'm entitled to my opinion, even a stopped clock is right twice a day

sozcan

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 19 posts
  • 4 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 27 May 2014 - 08:00 PM

Yes.



Snookie

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,625 posts
  • 267 thanks
174
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 27 May 2014 - 08:42 PM

Do they have guns..... are handcuffs out......I am going to let them do whatever they want to :cm:


Edited by Snookie, 27 May 2014 - 08:42 PM.

Posted Image
Live Long & Prosper

TAN85

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • Newbie
  • 43 posts
  • 10 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Zambia
    Zambia
  • Gender:Female

Posted 28 May 2014 - 08:42 AM

Love Snookie's post! :lol2:

 

On a serious note, I would definitely say no (although again I would say dependent of the type of plant)....EXCEPT for emergency situations (ie if a medical condition was so bad that the employee could not be removed from the plant to be tended by paramedics, or something like a hostage situation (!!) ).... in which case, there would be a proviso in the procedure for disposal of exposed/contaminate product and the sanitation of the facility following the incident....  but really, who needs the extra paperwork??? ;)


"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.."


Thanked by 1 Member:

Jus'me

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 54 posts
  • 22 thanks
6
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Missouri

Posted 28 May 2014 - 09:56 PM

No they should have to suffer like the rest of us.  Actually they may even try testing you on this to see if you enforce your policies.  I suggest if they take issue, ask them to walk on water, when they can do that then you will allow them to ignore the rules on PPE. But until then, they are required to follow the rules just like everybody else. :hypocrite:



KevinB

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 53 posts
  • 9 thanks
5
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine

Posted 28 May 2014 - 11:10 PM

Absolutely not. If they do not adhere to the rules themselves how can they enforce them.



Harish R

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 26 posts
  • 4 thanks
1
Neutral

  • India
    India
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Arab Emirates

Posted 29 May 2014 - 04:08 AM

Yes. If they want to inspect the premises.


Edited by Hareesh, 29 May 2014 - 04:08 AM.

With Best Regards

Harish


Antores

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 63 thanks
15
Good

  • Colombia
    Colombia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Raleigh, NC
  • Interests:Photograpy

Posted 29 May 2014 - 02:34 PM

You SHOULD follow the same food safety protocol for enforcement officers as any visitor (visitor sign in sheet, provide protection equipment, read rules… whatever you do to all visitors).  Most of the times they will be polite enough to agreed and follow your hygiene rules…. Especially because they are there for that, to see if you have rues and follow them..   

BUT with that said, they are ENFORCEMENT officers, so the actual answer to your questions of what they can do and not, you must check your local regulations and see how much authority they have..  All countries states and regulators would be different.

Finally, being ENFORCEMENT officers, there is always a chance of authority abuse…  (As Snookie said, if they have guns…) In my personal case an Inspector from the HEALT DEPARTMENT OF COLORADO, didn’t want to sign the visitor logs or agreed to our rules, with the excuse that he “has to do anything he has to do to inspect the plant”…  In that case, because of local regulations we would have been able to DENY the entry… but that would just put is in a black list with the department of health, so we just documented the situation and let him in.. (ny the way, he followed the rules, just didn't want to sign)

Bottom line, my advice would be ask them to follow the rules, but don’t push it.. They are the enforcers, not you..  If they do something wrong, or something that can contaminate the product, follow your FS protocols and document it.


Edited by Antores, 29 May 2014 - 02:36 PM.


Setanta

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,615 posts
  • 371 thanks
391
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading: historical fiction, fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Movies
    Gardening
    Birding

Posted 29 May 2014 - 03:09 PM

The ONLY thing I don't enforce hearing protection. I have asked USDA inspectors to not come in wearing incorrect pants, shoes or shirts, but hearing protection is their loss.(and it doesn't affect my product)


-Setanta         

 

 

 


SpursGirl

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 117 posts
  • 83 thanks
27
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:PA

Posted 29 May 2014 - 04:35 PM

I would say (almost) always yes!

 

I have requested that CFIA meat inspectors follow the hygiene rules of the plant and have also prevented them from bringing their own PPE and equipment (hard hats, thermometers etc) into the plant. These guys work extensively in the slaughter house environment and I do not wish them to bring equipment from a raw meat plant into my cooked ready to eat meat processing facility.

 

Initially I had plenty of arguements with them on that score but eventually I got them to agree to use of our plant PPE and equipment.

 

The only exception I have ever had on this was when we had a number of immigration offers arrive at a plant on a raid (whilstle blower follow-up) who demanded immediate access. They werre carrying guns and also had trained dogs in tow - not sure how I was going to get hair nets and booties onto a large german shepperd!

 

This prompted me to write an emergency access procedure detailing situatiuons where emergency access without following site hygiene procedure is allowed, conttrol of the access and clean up operations post access. This now covers things like emergency services access (police, fire, medical) - these are really the only exemptions to the site hygiene regulations.



Setanta

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,615 posts
  • 371 thanks
391
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading: historical fiction, fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Movies
    Gardening
    Birding

Posted 29 May 2014 - 05:24 PM

DOGS??? Oh my stars!


-Setanta         

 

 

 


Snookie

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,625 posts
  • 267 thanks
174
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 29 May 2014 - 08:55 PM

Sooooo how did you handle the dog part?


Posted Image
Live Long & Prosper

SpursGirl

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 117 posts
  • 83 thanks
27
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:PA

Posted 02 June 2014 - 04:35 PM

The officers were there to detain any illegal workers (not that we employed illegal workers but they had had a tip off from a disgruntled ex employee) and the dogs were there to 'search' for any employees may hide from the officers.

 

We had to let the dogs into the staff areas, warehouse and low care processing areas of the plant - they were on leashes and to be fair very well trained - but we resticted entry to our high care processing unit and did not let the dogs into that part of the plant. The officers searched high care and would have taken the dogs in if they felt there was potential of any hidden worker - luckily it was all ok!

 

Afterward was a massive top to bottom detail clean then swabbing to release the low care area back into use - very time consuming and costly.



Snookie

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,625 posts
  • 267 thanks
174
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 02 June 2014 - 05:36 PM

I would have liked to see the dog in booties and hair nets.  Would have made a great picture. 


Posted Image
Live Long & Prosper

Dharmadi Sadeli Putra

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 161 posts
  • 26 thanks
7
Neutral

  • Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 June 2014 - 03:58 AM

Can I ask  as a point of information, are enforcement officers, of any description, allowed to enter a processing plant without adhering to any of the hygiene rules attendant to that processing plant?

 

I'm just asking in case it would ever happen which is unlikely.........

Depends on what they do in processing area (emergency situation is an exemption)



AS NUR

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 582 posts
  • 60 thanks
9
Neutral

  • Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:east java, indonesia

Posted 03 June 2014 - 10:09 AM

i would say no...



Rob Marriner

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 14 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Berwick-Upon-Tweed
  • Interests:Enforcement, food safety management systems and training.

Posted 03 June 2014 - 10:49 AM

After 30 years of undertaking inspections I would always expect to follow the requirements of the food business. If I was not asked to do so, would it not suggest the business did not take their own requirements seriously?



Dharmadi Sadeli Putra

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 161 posts
  • 26 thanks
7
Neutral

  • Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 June 2014 - 04:30 AM

Defining an emergency (from wikipedia)

An incident, to be an emergency, conforms to one or more of the following, if it:

    - Poses an immediate threat to life, health, property, or environment
    - Has already caused loss of life, health detriments, property damage, or environmental damage
    - has a high probability of escalating to cause immediate danger to life, health, property, or environment

I'm wondering, does it make sense to ask the enforcement officer to follow hygienic rules in such situations?





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users