Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

BRC for Packaging- 5.4.4 Frequency of checks

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic
- - - - -

craiglbc

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 20 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 25 September 2014 - 01:34 PM

Hi all,

This particular area has my head spinning.  The standard states: Frequency of checks shall be in accordance with industry-accepted practice or customer requirements and based on risk analysis.

We print labels for food packaging and the occasional food contact packaging, I can not find any information on what is considered industry-accepted practice, and our customers do not have requirements for frequency of quality checks.

Would it be sufficient if I was to conduct a 'generic' risk assessment for this sub-section.  We already have procedures in place (which have been in place for years) for frequency of quality checks during a print run and they have been effective, although I have no documentation as to how we came up with the frequency we currently use and I know BRC loves documentation on EVERYTHING.  

Any suggestions??

Craig



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 25 September 2014 - 04:15 PM

Dear craiglbc,

 

One generic solution is under the 3rd "quote"  / first 2 links of this recent post - 

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...ge-3#entry78108

 

Rgds / Charles.C

 

PS - a small amount of creative thought is required but should not be overly difficult.

IMO the repetitive appearance of this RA inserted phrase has simply become a routine a** cover these days with no particular intended objective. Hopefully auditors will agree appropriately.. :smile:


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


craiglbc

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 20 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 25 September 2014 - 04:24 PM

This 100% answered my question, thank you!!!





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users