Dear MWidra,
I know that it is always optimal for the internal auditors to be knowledgeable about the scheme, but how much depth of knowledge do they need to fulfill the requirements of the standard?
Unfortunately, I would say "considerable". Not so much from a GMP aspect, or even on "basic" HACCP but more on the FS sub-topics.But it again depends on the FS knowledge base. I have encountered certified auditors ranging the whole gamut of HACCP awareness.
(a) The product / process may be relevant to your query, eg "simple/non-simple".
(b) Plus whether the 2 persons referred are familiar with any other, GFSI recognized, FS Standards other than BRC ? I also assume documentation would be included in their audit scope.
If the answer to (b) is negative, understanding the BRC expectations regarding Risk Assessment may be a significant problem (and, based on this forum, even if they are familiar with, say, SQF).
The emphasis / viewpoint / philosophy in certain areas for different FS standards is IMO simply different, eg for BRC / SQF / IFS / ISO-FSSC22000.
BRC is additionally driven by due diligence considerations (from a UK POV), which IMO sometimes influences the Standard in directions other than Food Safety.
But the lucky 2 should at least be faced with a relatively Codex/ISO - friendly interpretation of Validation-Verification.
Rgds / Charles.C
PS - i particularly base my opinion on coming from a BRC background and observing the miscellany of SQF/ISO/IFS requirements on this forum. Sometimes it's like viewing another world, in both good/bad ways.
Edited by Charles.C, 28 January 2015 - 10:21 AM.
expanded