Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Copy of BRC/IOP standard


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

dianasamson

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 13 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Philippines
    Philippines

Posted 14 February 2015 - 08:34 AM

Hi everyone , may I request for any member of this group copy of the standard, need to review the said standard for comparison with ISO 22000. I am still confused which of the two I would recommend we opt for certification.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,859 posts
  • 5248 thanks
1,226
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 14 February 2015 - 09:57 AM

Hi everyone , may I request for any member of this group copy of the standard, need to review the said standard for comparison with ISO 22000. I am still confused which of the two I would recommend we opt for certification.

Dear dianasamson,

 

afaik, the standard is copyright.

 

BRC website used to offer a free shortened version with the auditable text called the "packaging self-assessment tool" but I think no longer on website. Could try googling.

 

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


shea quay

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 180 posts
  • 92 thanks
23
Excellent

  • Ireland
    Ireland
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 February 2015 - 08:47 PM

BRC Version 7 us free online at http://www.brcbooksh...378/food-safety. This comes into effect in the summer. Whilst the standard itself is free, notes and support are 95 sterling a year. There is a clause in section 1 that essentially makes you pay this to comply with the standard. Very clever, those BRC chaps.

 

Version 6 is, as Charles correctly points out, is subjected to copyright and is not available legally online. 



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,859 posts
  • 5248 thanks
1,226
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 15 February 2015 - 04:34 AM

Dear dianasamson,

 

Food or Packaging ? Only you know the answer ? And possibly Shakespeare :biggrin: .

 

Please clarify the suspense. :smile:

 

Rgds / Charles.C

 

PS - mention of a Version number would have helped. And possibly a High/Low .


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


dianasamson

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 13 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Philippines
    Philippines

Posted 17 February 2015 - 07:36 AM

for food and hygienic packaging :)



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,859 posts
  • 5248 thanks
1,226
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 17 February 2015 - 08:05 AM

for food and hygienic packaging :)

Dear dianasamson,

 

If i understand correctly, the previous posts should enable ca. 75% success. (100% if only auditable Packaging content required).

 

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


cazyncymru

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • Banned
  • 1,604 posts
  • 340 thanks
126
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 February 2015 - 01:09 PM

Hi Diana

 

This is the draft version that went out for consultation.

 

Caz x



Thanked by 1 Member:



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users