Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

SQF 7.2 vs BRC Issue 7 comparative matrix


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 DenisB

DenisB

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 31 posts
  • 4 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montreal' Qc Canada

Posted 11 May 2015 - 07:12 PM

All 20 sites of our  company are SQF, we have just aquired 5 new facilities that are currently BRC issue 6 and 7. We wish to convert these facilities to SQF 7.2 and we are looking to see if anyone has a cross reference matrix that will show or link each SQF 7.2 requirement to the BRC issue 6 or 7 requirements.

 

Thanks for your help

 

DenisB



#2 sutan77

sutan77

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 25 posts
  • 6 thanks
0
Neutral

  • New Zealand
    New Zealand

Posted 12 May 2015 - 08:58 PM

This is will be interesting topics for me as one of my supplier was asking the same question. They would like to GFSI certified supplier. Our company is using SQF at the moment.. Waiting for reply :)



#3 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,037 posts
  • 5051 thanks
1,070
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 13 May 2015 - 10:06 PM

All 20 sites of our  company are SQF, we have just aquired 5 new facilities that are currently BRC issue 6 and 7. We wish to convert these facilities to SQF 7.2 and we are looking to see if anyone has a cross reference matrix that will show or link each SQF 7.2 requirement to the BRC issue 6 or 7 requirements.

 

Thanks for your help

 

DenisB

 

Hi Denis.

 

Up-to-date, detailed, comparisons of the GFSI recognised standards seem to be rare.

There should be a tabulation on the GFSI website but probably only dated at ca. 2012. Access requires (free) sign up but the system seems clunky. :smile:

 

I have attached the latest cross-matrix evaluations I could find below in chronological order. Regrettably, Brc 6/7 so far not turned up. Hopefully other pairs of eyes will do better. :smile:

The 2011 item is sparse on detail but quite well arranged/commented IMO.

 

Attached File  Comparison (detailed) brc4 - sqf2000,iso22000,ifs,et al (ca.2007).xls   76KB   66 downloads

Attached File  Comparison brc5 - sqf2000,iso22000 (2008).pdf   477.38KB   50 downloads

Attached File  Comparison (condensed) for brc5 - sqf6(2011).pdf   376.23KB   67 downloads


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

#4 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,037 posts
  • 5051 thanks
1,070
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 14 May 2015 - 06:22 AM

addendum

 

Just for interest, here is a brc3 comparison which has IMO a nicely laid out format (see the tables at extreme end of file).

 

Attached File  comparison (2006) brc3 - (sqf,ifs,iso22000,dutch haccp).pdf   456.54KB   37 downloads

 

Note the relatively  simpler expectations, eg no direct allergenic entries. Times have changed. :smile:

 

PS - just in case anyone might be interested, there is a cross-matrix of brc6 / ifs6 here -

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...indpost&p=87004


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users