Hi ajahmoh,
Thanks for the documents. i assume this is "traditional" haccp, not ISO. I'm unaware of the local regulatory requirements (if any) so comments generic.
I had a quick look (there is a lot of material). A few initial comments -
(1) (a) The flow chart is insufficiently detailed with a side-effect to the haccp plan, eg receiving/storage raw materials.
(b) Numbers would enormously assist.
(c) MD seems in illogical location. May render the subsequent steps incorrect from a hazard POV.
(2) Column R IMO should be moved "leftwards"
(3) column F looks massively "repetitional" (by eye). Just a thought.
(4) cell 14C, some of yr "biological hazards" are incorrect, eg plate count
(5) metal detection step is strangely described due 1c. subsequent steps thereby debatable for metal.
(6) i deduce there is no pathogen kill step in this process. The PRPs are likely going to be very scrutinised since salmonella is a well-known hazard in main raw material plus a lot of added materials.
(7) Control measures have no mention regarding Time. This is pathogen relevant and especially due (6). Reason is listing PRPs only can be insufficient.
(8) allergen control in finished product seems absent ?.
(9) IMO yr PRP document as shown here is inadequate for the reasons discussed previously. But not due to lack of individual hazard analyses.
If i have missed (visually/knowledge) seeing the reasons for any of above, my apologies in advance (chocolate not one of my process-familiar areas ).
PS - the hazard analysis as shown is probably 80%+ complete. The PRPs needs more working on/cross-referencing IMO.
But maybe this customer's haccp requirements are less demanding than USA etc ? (or maybe i am over-estimating USA)