Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Food defense evaluation for issue 5?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

foodeng

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 27 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Turkey
    Turkey

Posted 14 October 2016 - 01:37 PM

Has anybody created a checklist for food defense including artwork and approved print?



Malar

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 8 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 16 October 2016 - 04:18 AM

Hi Foodeng,

 

No. Still in discussion actually.

Since all the artwork  (legal and so on) and design is from customer, do we need to do this?

Current control is only artwork and approved print against customer approval print sheet but not focusing on food defense.

 

:oops2:Can someone assist to clarify if I am in a wrong pathway or understanding... 

 

 

Advance Thanks,

Malar



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,860 posts
  • 5248 thanks
1,226
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 16 October 2016 - 04:38 AM

Has anybody created a checklist for food defense including artwork and approved print?

 

Which clause in BRC Packaging 5 are you considering ?

 

I cannot find any mention of defence/defense ?


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Malar

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 8 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 17 October 2016 - 12:48 AM

HI Charles,

 

You are right. It is not food defense. More towards quality parameters against customer specification.

 

Regards,

Malar



foodeng

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 27 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Turkey
    Turkey

Posted 17 October 2016 - 08:52 AM

Dear Charles,

 

5.2.7 Where artwork files and approved masters are in electronic form, these shall be suitably protected to prevent loss or malicious intervention.

 

And also I have read more 'malicious' technical word about food defense in other items.

2.2.5

3.2.2

3.4.6

5.2.9

5.9

5.9.2

5.10

5.10.1



Pipa

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 14 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • South Africa
    South Africa

Posted 25 October 2016 - 07:12 AM

Dear Charles,

 

5.2.7 Where artwork files and approved masters are in electronic form, these shall be suitably protected to prevent loss or malicious intervention.

 

And also I have read more 'malicious' technical word about food defense in other items.

2.2.5

3.2.2

3.4.6

5.2.9

5.9

5.9.2

5.10

5.10.1

IMO I  think here they mean if in electronic form then password protected computers must be ensured?? or some form of restricted use to prevent changes and damages to artwork.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users