Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Non-conformance against clause 2.4.4.8


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Sabear

Sabear

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 60 posts
  • 3 thanks
3
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

Posted 24 January 2018 - 05:55 PM

Non-conformance: The facility has not identified the risk rating for raw material suppliers, packaging suppliers and contract service providers.

 

Auditor told me I could just add another column onto our registry for suppliers and contractors and rate the risk they pose (low, medium, high).

Is it really that simple? I feel like this isn't enough, and can't find anything on here when I search.

 

Please Advise.

 

Thank you so much in advance



#2 FurFarmandFork

FurFarmandFork

    Food Safety Consultant, Production Supervisor

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,264 posts
  • 581 thanks
179
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oregon, USA

Posted 24 January 2018 - 06:27 PM

Yeah it generally is. However note that your FSMA food safety plan does require a more formal hazard analysis for each category of ingredient.

 

It will depend on auditor as to how robust your "risk rating" system needs to be, but definitely not having one in general will give you a big 'ol NC.


Austin Bouck
Owner/Consultant at Fur, Farm, and Fork.
Consulting for companies needing effective, lean food safety systems and solutions.

Subscribe to the blog at furfarmandfork.com for food safety research, insights, and analysis.

#3 jcieslowski

jcieslowski

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 168 posts
  • 57 thanks
23
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 January 2018 - 09:31 PM

Pretty much.

 

In my industry, I has only 4 ingredients and some packaging materials.  I put the packaging as 'low' risk, because food doesn't touch it, the ingredients that are used BEFORE a cook step as medium because cooking will help eliminate problems, and the 'after cooking' ingredients as 'high risk'.  Then I required a COA for the after cooking products to address their riskier nature.



#4 Anil Dhawan

Anil Dhawan

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 25 January 2018 - 12:38 PM

Hi,this is Anil Dhawan from India. In case you feel just adding risk level is not enough you could carry out a brief analysis of some of the risk factors. In brief you can list the factors and if it adds up to (Low, Medium or High) that's the risk category for the supplier. The imp thing is to 'keep it simple' in order to avoid questions!






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users