Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Does FSSC 22000 v3.1 require VACCP/TACCP implementation?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 pamelachinyemba

pamelachinyemba

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Zimbabwe
    Zimbabwe

Posted 22 June 2018 - 06:25 PM

Hello 

 

I am new to FSSC implementation and I need assistance, i will be going through a surveillance audit for FSSC 22000 v 3.1 and I was wondering does this version require  vaccp/taccp implementation? I know this is definitely a requirement for FSSC 22000 V 4. If anyone knows also what to expect for these kinds of audits I would really appreciate. 

 

Itai



#2 jdpaul

jdpaul

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 179 posts
  • 149 thanks
22
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 22 June 2018 - 07:45 PM

Hi,

 

See slide 19.

 

http://www.fssc22000...version-4.1.pdf

You do need to do the assessment.


Edited by jdpaul, 22 June 2018 - 07:45 PM.


#3 Pipa

Pipa

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 14 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • South Africa
    South Africa

Posted 09 November 2018 - 08:07 AM

Hi Pamela,

 

You are required to do so, as per the section on "FSSC Additional Requirements'.

 

Regards,

 

Phillipah



#4 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,489 posts
  • 4865 thanks
950
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 11 November 2018 - 05:32 AM

afaik (not a user) food fraud appeared in ver 4

 

So if yr audit is to version 3.1 the answer appears to be No.

 

Is audit to 3.1 still possible ??


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#5 Pipa

Pipa

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 14 posts
  • 2 thanks
0
Neutral

  • South Africa
    South Africa

Posted 12 November 2018 - 06:42 AM

oh I see didnt see she was referring to 3.1 which I think its not possible anymore.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users