Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Is it mandatory to have a COA for every product during receiving?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 rsuong

rsuong

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 24 posts
  • 2 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 25 June 2018 - 02:42 AM

Is it mandatory to have a COA for every product during time of receiving?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



#2 dhernick

dhernick

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 25 June 2018 - 04:18 PM

If it is your policy to receive a COA with all ingredients then it is required.   Rejection and Hold based on a missing COA should be in a documented policy, otherwise, the COA requirement has no teeth.

 

Based on an ingredient Risk assessment and assigned risk level there are options for requiring COAs based on ingredient risk.  If you are controlling a hazard, that hazard may not need to be on a COA, you may not need a COA for that Hazard.  If the COA you are getting does not have the important or critical information it may not need to be required.  If the role of the COA can be satisfied in other ways, a COA may not be necessary.



#3 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,084 posts
  • 787 thanks
652
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Truth is like a delicious slice of watermelon... you just want more and more!

Posted 25 June 2018 - 04:49 PM

Well, it depends on what your standard calls for.

 

Our company has COA's for all products on file - a COA is not required to come with the delivery however because we have them on file.


Kind regards,

 

Glenn Oster
 
GOC GROUP / +1.800.793.7042 / Food - Food Packaging - Food Storage/DC

SQF, BRC & IFS System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants

Serving Small-to-Mid-Size Businesses | We are International - Accepting all major C-Currencies

Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant | SQF, BRC & IFS Pre-Development or Pre-Audit GAP

http://www.GlennOsterConsulting.com  -- 

 

 

60% Savings to Ownership/Senior Partners when using C-Currency "XRP" Expires: 04-NOV-20

https://glennosterco...-development-pr
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

#4 GrumpyZA28

GrumpyZA28

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 8 posts
  • 5 thanks
1
Neutral

  • South Africa
    South Africa
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cape Town, South Africa
  • Interests:Food Engineering Operations; Food Microbiology; Food Quality Assurance; Food Safety Management Systems. FSMS Auditing, Food Legislative Compliance & Consulting.

Posted 26 June 2018 - 07:20 AM

Greetings, All

 

I relate to the remark "...COA with no teeth." Had rather disadvantageous repercussions where untrained staff took initiative to received stock - due to Production "NEED" - circumventing protocol. This had been resolved with retraining and disciplinary action.

 

Similarly, drafting in-house specifications, my query relates to the recommended design viz. critical content for the COA requested from Food Industry Cleaning detergents.

 

References to templates and/or details w.r.t. guidelines will be appreciated.



#5 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,378 posts
  • 4836 thanks
943
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 26 June 2018 - 09:36 AM

Is it mandatory to have a COA for every product during time of receiving?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Assuming SQF,  IIRC they specify what they want.

 

IIRC it's everything ?

 

@SQFC

Not required for every Lot ?


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#6 liberator

liberator

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 57 posts
  • 25 thanks
9
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Sci-Fi - Movies/TV
    Model Kit Building
    Gardening
    Home Renovations
    Riding my Motorcycle

Posted 26 June 2018 - 09:39 PM

It really depends on your own risk assessments of the materials you purchase what you require and what food quality standard you have, eg BRC, SQF etc.

 

Food quality standards require you to have a documented procedure for the acceptance of packaging and raw materials of which the acceptance is based on a risk assessment of these materials.

 

The BRC standard gives you an option of one or a combination of methods to determine acceptability of receipt and use of your raw materials and packaging.

 

Sample and testing.

Inspection at receipt

COA

COC

 

If you have completed your material risk assessments you should already have your own requirements. You should have on file at a minimum, your vendors own product specifications. You'll need these specifications to compare any of your own analysis or COA/COC results against the specification parameters you have on file (providing the COA's do not already record the parameter limits.) It's a sanity check as well as some vendors can change their limits and neglect to tell you. They can also send you materials that are out of specification without telling you. Yes this does happen and has happened to our business a few times!

 

Depending on the complexity of the product you can be provided with a  COC - certificate of conformance which basically means that the product will meet the product specification. Salt for example is only ever provided to us with a COC.  The vendor could provide a COA - certificate of analysis, which means the product has been tested/checked and released against the specification and the results report will align with the limits set in the agreed to the vendor specification.

 

The GFSI food quality standards always has some requirement for a procedure to be in place for raw material and packaging acceptance monitoring. The decision is up to you how you want to check your incoming raw materials but you have to have something in place if you want to meet the GFSI quality system requirements. 






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

EV SSL Certificate