Thanks' JoGriffiths.BRCGS' for posting. I've been reading through the standard and came to 5.4.8 . Does anyone else think that these additions are a bit excessive? Do we really need a separate line clearance procedure for each type of line that describes all areas of potential entrapment of materials? And 'roles of persons'...really? Here's the proposed clause:
The documented line clearance procedure shall include:
• the roles of persons involved in line clearance
• areas where materials can become trapped
• validation of the line clearance
• sign-off for continuing production
The line clearance procedure shall be fully implemented for each production run.
Thanks for your input,