Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
- - - - -

GMP Audit report - To score or not to score?!

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 BB123


    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks

  • Canada

Posted 04 July 2019 - 06:02 PM



Thru the years I have used several versions of internal auditing/inspecting reports for GMP.  In the IFSQN implementation package for SQF they give an example of an audit checklist (QMR031) and a sample factory GMP audit that has a scoring system. We are a relatively small co-packing operations that only handles shelf stable food products that arrive already in primary packaging.  We occupy a 20,000 sqft. facility.   We complete a detailed internal audit in about an hour.  In the past, I have had both BRC and large customer auditors recommend against scoring audits suggesting that that they permit manipulation to achieve a "passing grade".  The preferred method, at least in my experience is utilizing a checklist of all the GMP stuff to evaluate and focus more on deviations, corrective actions and the follow-ups.   Curious to here some other internal auditor's thoughts.


Thank you!

#2 SQFconsultant



  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,076 posts
  • 782 thanks

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Truth is like a delicious slice of watermelon... you just want more and more!

Posted 04 July 2019 - 10:48 PM

Don't need to score. Based on number of issues one can tell if good, bad, etc.

Kind regards,


Glenn Oster
GOC GROUP / +1.800.793.7042 / Food - Food Packaging - Food Storage/DC

SQF, BRC & IFS System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants

Serving Small-to-Mid-Size Businesses | International Cross-Border C-CUR Acceptance

Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant | SQF, BRC & IFS Pre-Development or Pre-Audit GAP

http://www.GlennOsterConsulting.com  -- 



URGENT - No more Jonah in the whale...











#3 Charles.C


    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 17,342 posts
  • 4831 thanks

  • Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF

Posted 05 July 2019 - 09:58 PM

As far as I can see, Both BRC and SQF  "Score" to make Acceptability/Ranking  Assessments.

Kind Regards,



#4 bakeryscience


    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 116 posts
  • 11 thanks

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Cooking and baking, photography, painting, pets, travel

Posted 05 July 2019 - 09:59 PM

We have never scored our internal audits.

#5 Ryan M.

Ryan M.

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 955 posts
  • 375 thanks

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham, AL
  • Interests:Reading, crosswords, passionate discussions, laughing at US politics.

Posted 06 July 2019 - 05:11 AM

Well that depends...what would be your purpose in scoring?


Some facilities use scoring as part of their KPI's / KPM's.  If you do score it you can use that as part of your statistical component in tracking and continuous improvement of your SQF system.


Over 10 years ago I had an audit template I used with scoring.  Any area less than a certain score would be promoted and prioritized.  Scoring could help you determine priorities if your resources are limited.

#6 zanorias


    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 757 posts
  • 218 thanks

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Motorcycling, Food Safety, Science, Water Sports, Nature

Posted 06 July 2019 - 08:55 AM

My internal audits are scored which equates to a colour code; a "traffic light" system, and the colours are whats recorded in the trending. I'm a bit sceptical of this approach though, as the "best" colour score allows for considerable non-conformance's, so I don't think standards are as good as they could be if it were a number system incorporating the number of non-conformance's and the severity.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

EV SSL Certificate