Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

GMP Audit report - To score or not to score?!


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 BB123

BB123

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 04 July 2019 - 06:02 PM

Hello,

 

Thru the years I have used several versions of internal auditing/inspecting reports for GMP.  In the IFSQN implementation package for SQF they give an example of an audit checklist (QMR031) and a sample factory GMP audit that has a scoring system. We are a relatively small co-packing operations that only handles shelf stable food products that arrive already in primary packaging.  We occupy a 20,000 sqft. facility.   We complete a detailed internal audit in about an hour.  In the past, I have had both BRC and large customer auditors recommend against scoring audits suggesting that that they permit manipulation to achieve a "passing grade".  The preferred method, at least in my experience is utilizing a checklist of all the GMP stuff to evaluate and focus more on deviations, corrective actions and the follow-ups.   Curious to here some other internal auditor's thoughts.

 

Thank you!



#2 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,419 posts
  • 868 thanks
738
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:American Patriot
    WWG1WGA

Posted 04 July 2019 - 10:48 PM

Don't need to score. Based on number of issues one can tell if good, bad, etc.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC Group | +1.800.793.7042 | Serving the Food, Food Packaging & Food Storage Industries
SQF Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants 
 
In a nutshell we help small to large businesses to get their act together (as needed), help them to co-develop
entire SQF documentation systems, make recommendations as to installations and repairs in order
to get certified and continue with on-going support thru our popular eConsultant program and we do
all in about 30 days so your staff can implement with our assistance to retain and get new business!
 
Serving the new Republic of the United States of America & Alliance Countries

http://www.GlennOster.com


#3 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,029 posts
  • 5050 thanks
1,069
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 05 July 2019 - 09:58 PM

As far as I can see, Both BRC and SQF  "Score" to make Acceptability/Ranking  Assessments.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#4 bakeryscience

bakeryscience

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 116 posts
  • 11 thanks
17
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Cooking and baking, photography, painting, candle making, pets, travel

Posted 05 July 2019 - 09:59 PM

We have never scored our internal audits.



#5 Ryan M.

Ryan M.

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,059 posts
  • 406 thanks
201
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham, AL
  • Interests:Reading, crosswords, passionate discussions, laughing at US politics.

Posted 06 July 2019 - 05:11 AM

Well that depends...what would be your purpose in scoring?

 

Some facilities use scoring as part of their KPI's / KPM's.  If you do score it you can use that as part of your statistical component in tracking and continuous improvement of your SQF system.

 

Over 10 years ago I had an audit template I used with scoring.  Any area less than a certain score would be promoted and prioritized.  Scoring could help you determine priorities if your resources are limited.



#6 zanorias

zanorias

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 778 posts
  • 230 thanks
149
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Motorcycling, Food Safety, Science, Water Sports, Nature

Posted 06 July 2019 - 08:55 AM

My internal audits are scored which equates to a colour code; a "traffic light" system, and the colours are whats recorded in the trending. I'm a bit sceptical of this approach though, as the "best" colour score allows for considerable non-conformance's, so I don't think standards are as good as they could be if it were a number system incorporating the number of non-conformance's and the severity.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users