Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

How to write an exclusion to a clause into our procedures?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic
- - - - -

karlieh

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 23 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 15 November 2019 - 08:18 PM

2.3.4 does not apply to our program. How do I write that into procedure? Our consultant just put N/A.in our report.


  • 0

Hank Major

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 317 posts
  • 102 thanks
34
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 15 November 2019 - 08:34 PM

Long ago, I created an SOP for handling outside contract manufacturers even though my client never used one. It just says that they will be held to the same standard as an supplier. So, for example, they need to provide a Specification, and a COA for each lot of finished product.


  • 0

karlieh

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 23 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 15 November 2019 - 09:12 PM

We don't have any outside manufacturers. We manufacture everything in house.


  • 0

Hank Major

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 317 posts
  • 102 thanks
34
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 15 November 2019 - 09:22 PM

We don't have any outside manufacturers. We manufacture everything in house.

 

Exactly. So the SOP basically says, "if we had outside contractors, they would be held to the standards in the supplier SOP (which see)." 


  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,147 posts
  • 1239 thanks
1,274
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Home now on Martha's Vineyard Island/Republic of these United States

Posted 15 November 2019 - 09:58 PM

For our clients that do not have any contact manufacturers we write 2.3.4 Contract Manufacturers statement (for the benefit really of the Auditor) that the company does not presently use the services of contract manfacturers, but that in the future the company will follow the requirements of 2.3.4 and any other applicable requirements should the company decide to use a contract manufacturer.

 

Works everytime.

 

Don't know what the heck N/A on a report means.


  • 1

All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

 

 

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC 

SQF Consultant

http://www.GlennOster.com  -- 774.563.6161

 

 

Blog

https://t.me/gcemvi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Thanked by 2 Members:

kfromNE

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,253 posts
  • 327 thanks
392
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Bicycling, reading, nutrition, trivia

Posted 15 November 2019 - 10:29 PM


Don't know what the heck N/A on a report means.

 

I'm guessing the consultant meant that the rule didn't apply to them since they don't use contract manufacturers, he put down not applicable. But as you know, like with allergens and other clauses, you can't write that.


Edited by kfromNE, 15 November 2019 - 10:30 PM.

  • 0

FoodSafetyPlanet

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 88 posts
  • 31 thanks
25
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 November 2019 - 04:56 AM

Hi Karlie,

Create it the same way you would if it were a procedure; however, in the body text say it is non applicable.


  • 0

The Food Scientist

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,060 posts
  • 270 thanks
210
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Food Science, Nature, SQF, Learning, Trying out new foods, Sarcasm.

Posted 18 November 2019 - 05:07 PM

My experience you dont need to put anything into procedure because it doesn't apply. The auditor will ask you when he gets to that and you will simply say "no we dont use contract manufacturing", and they will write N/A.

 

It worked with like 5 auditors I had :)


  • 0

Everything in food is science. The only subjective part is when you eat it. - Alton Brown.


kingstudruler1

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,100 posts
  • 358 thanks
355
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 20 November 2019 - 06:19 PM

I agree you don't need to do anything.   you may want to create a procedure on how you would handle them. 

 

Ive seen NAs in numerous sections.  


  • 0

eb2fee_785dceddab034fa1a30dd80c7e21f1d7~

    Twofishfs@gmail.com

 


Hoosiersmoker

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 730 posts
  • 233 thanks
135
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 21 November 2019 - 05:17 PM

You can't write procedure for something you don't do. 2.3.4 is a non-mandatory element for just that reason. You will however have to explain that to your auditor. Last year we had a contract manufacturer but unfortunately they went out of business a few months ago. We audited them annually for 4 years. Had a program in place and passed that section of the re-cert audit We received all of our WIP from them and that was that. Yesterday the auditor asked if we had a contract manufacturer and we said not any more. He marked it N/A and moved on.

 

We receive N/A submissions for a few elements. It simply means there is nothing we can do within our organization for that element- We perform no action toward it therefore there is nothing to audit.


  • 0



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users