Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Thoughts on using an ISO corrugate supplier instead of a GFSI certified?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

ral491994

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 58 posts
  • 2 thanks
2
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 29 July 2020 - 06:06 PM

Hi All, 

 

We currently manufacture product that is placed in a GFSI certified packaging. We additionally place the package into corrugate. The packaging should always be sealed upon place into the corrugate. 

 

What are your thoughts for using an ISO corrugate supplier instead of a GFSI certified? I am assuming i would need to do a risk assessment for an ISO supplier. 

 

Thanks in advance. 



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,821 posts
  • 960 thanks
852
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:American Patriot
    WWG1WGA
    Never give up, never give in - always win!
    Martha's Vineyard Island, Massachusetts

Posted 29 July 2020 - 06:40 PM

Your suppliers are not required to be GFSI (SQF, BRC, IFS, FSSC, etc.) certified and ISO is acceptable.

 

And..  a risk assessment is done on all suppliers, regardless - score cards, etc.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC BUSINESS GROUP | SQF System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
Internal Auditor Training - eConsultant - Pre & Post SQF-GAP Audits - Consultant Training
Visit us @ http://www.GlennOster.com  or call us @ 772.646.4115 US-EST 8am-4pm Anyday except Thursday
 
 

Thanked by 1 Member:

Hoosiersmoker

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 551 posts
  • 196 thanks
82
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 10 August 2020 - 04:14 PM

Agreed. Outer packaging / corrugate is almost irrelevant. Even then, most corrugated processes are fast enough (and use steam processes) that the risk of contamination is very low. Add that to being an outer package and the risk to your product is about zero.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users