Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Requirements for a raw materials Declaration of Compliance

Declaration of Compliance in

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

PolystarMark

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 15 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 21 October 2020 - 01:57 PM

Hi 

I wonder if anybody could shed some light on the requirements for Declaration of Compliance in raw materials. I'm preparing for an upcoming BRC audit and thought I would ensure I had all raw material DOC's. I have always been of the opinion that the DOC needed to be dated within the past 12 months. But I thought I would check it out in the regs 1935/2004 & 10/2011 as well as the BRC standard. I couldn't find anything that said the DoC needed re-issuing other than following a change. Am I ok to go into the audit with DoC's some of them dating back to 2018.

thanks

 

Mark  



olenazh

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 732 posts
  • 219 thanks
205
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:My job, church, reading, gym, horror movies

Posted 21 October 2020 - 02:04 PM

Why do you need DOC, you're not satisfied with LOGs? That's extra work in my opinion, and I never heard of regulatory requirements to have DOCs for raw materials - unless, UK regulations require that.



pHruit

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,811 posts
  • 721 thanks
433
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Composing/listening to classical music, electronics, mountain biking, science, sarcasm

Posted 21 October 2020 - 02:14 PM

Why do you need DOC, you're not satisfied with LOGs?

LOGs seem to be more of a US-style thing - quite rare to see them used in Europe, and indeed the only time I've been asked for them is by clients in the US.

 

 

Am I ok to go into the audit with DoC's some of them dating back to 2018.

Do the DOCs include a specified period of validity? With most of the packaging materials I've used, the compliance statement will include something to the effect of a "valid for 24 months from date of issue" statement or similar.

If you don't have that then it might be worth dropping a quick note to your packaging supplier(s) just to check if the existing DOCs are still valid. Really its up to them to determine whether that is the case, although a lot of the BRC supplier/spec stuff seems to work on a period of not more than three years. It's not exactly explicit on this in the packaging standard IIRC, but it's the figure I'd expect the auditor to have in mind - as such you'll probably be ok with info dated 2018, but for the sake of a few quick calls/emails to check, I'd speak to the supplier as that is easier than arguing the point if you get one of the more pedantic auditors...
 



Thanked by 1 Member:

Foodworker

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 318 posts
  • 220 thanks
27
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 21 October 2020 - 03:25 PM

You don't say which product type you make, but you did mention 10/2011 so I would assume it is plastics. In principle, a D of C only needs updating where there is a substantial change to the production or materials used, or if there is new scientific knowledge. When EU2002/72 changed to EU10/2011 they were OK to accept

a D of C under the old regs for up to 5 years.

 

But, (there always is a but) if it is plastics, there have been several amendments to EU10/2011 since 2018 and your suppliers' D of Cs need to state compliance to these newer amendments unless they are clearly not applicable.

 

Another potential auditor trap is if you have defined a specification review period in your system (3.4.5) and it is shorter than the time since the D of C was issued you may get an NC as D of Cs can be interpreted as specifications. Most companies seem to put in 3 years for the review so hopefully you would be OK.



Thanked by 1 Member:



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users