I agree with jd, and this is something that I think all of us have struggled with from time to time. As jd mentioned, there should be a screening process, in our plant this screening helps determine if it's a simple 'correction' (example-trash in warehouse b near north overhead door overflowing-assigned sani team to empty) as opposed to having overflowing trash 3 audits in a row, which would trigger a CA with root cause (do frequencies need to be increased on emptying, extra trash receptacles, etc.).
I'm in that phase now, and the current hurdle is getting buy in and completion at the 'correction' level (shift leads/ast plant manager) before issues start recurring and flipping over to needing full corrective actions (plant manager/global quality escalation).