Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Wet wiping = thorough rinse?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

Smitty

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 28 April 2022 - 07:31 PM

Environment is whole fresh fruit packing operation. Goal is to minimize presence of moisture wherever possible.

Challenging soils on food contact surfaces are natural and applied waxes and fruit residues along with adhesive residues from PLU stickers that don't stick to fruit.

Labels of most the most effective cleaners tested state that "thorough rinsing with potable water is necessary." Alcohol-based dry cleaners are not nearly as effective and cost a lot more.

Is wiping down a cleaned food contact surface with a towel wetted with potable water considered a thorough rinse for the purpose of compliance with label? 


  • 0

Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 6,033 posts
  • 1635 thanks
1,808
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 28 April 2022 - 07:35 PM

Doubtful, it's not really a "thorough" rinse and you will probably be left with chemical residue that will transfer to the fruit-hence the requirement for a rinse, not wipe


  • 0

Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,117 posts
  • 1230 thanks
1,267
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Home now on Martha's Vineyard Island/Republic of these United States

Posted 29 April 2022 - 02:22 AM

That wont cut. Bring in the hoses.


  • 0

All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

 

 

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC 

SQF Full System Co-Creator & Implementation/Certification Consulting

Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant | Equity-Share Private Label Developers

http://www.GlennOster.com  -- 774.563.6161

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users