Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Primus vs SQF vs USDA for Warehouse

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic
- - - - -

veruca

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 54 posts
  • 5 thanks
11
Good

  • United States
    United States

Posted 29 December 2022 - 05:00 PM

Hope everyone is ready to tackle the new year! 

 

To keep up with requirements, we need to get our warehouse/distribution company onto a GFSI benchmarked audit scheme. Historically they have been USDA GAP and their sister manufacturing company is PrimusGFS. This company does strictly the purchasing and sale of whole and fresh-cut produce. No handling, repack, case breaking, etc. How it comes in is how it goes out. The debate is which scheme is best suited for this profile. We're familiar with Primus and SQF and USDA. Is there one preferred over the other in this case? USDA I'm not sure about just because of benchmarking hurdles. The upgraded scheme is being driven by customer requirements. Thanks!

 

veruca



maggiemay

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 6 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 29 December 2022 - 05:27 PM

PrimusGFS has a scope for storage and distribution.  It is geared toward the produce industry.  With the sister company already PrimusGFS, it would make sense to have the warehouse use PrimusGFS.   



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,681 posts
  • 1145 thanks
1,135
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 30 December 2022 - 02:34 AM

PrimusGFS or SQF.


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users