Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Choosing the right GFSI Certification

Share this

Best Answer , 14 August 2023 - 05:16 PM

Having created both BRC and SQF compliant programs over the years, I would probably pick SQF for the following reasons.  However, there really isnt much difference.  Either one is fine.  

 

1.  You are located in the USA where SQF is more popular.  It seems like there are more options for auditors, training, employees with knowledge/ community support, etc.   

2.   in general, I find the standard to be less prescriptive.   That may be a benefit to you.   it may not.  

3.  Not all of the guidance docs are free from BRC.  

 

 

I have used several of the certification companies over the years.   I haven't had any serious issues with any of them.   Maybe I have been lucky.   I have recently had several audits quoted.   there didn't seem to be a lot of price difference between them.  


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic
- - - - -

DaveK

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 12 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 11 August 2023 - 06:18 PM

I am employed at a modestly-sized co-packing enterprise. Currently, we are endeavoring to achieve GFSI Certification. The choice between SQF, BRC, or potentially other certification pathways presents itself as a matter of consideration. Ideally, for our inaugural certification, we aspire to embark upon a trajectory of relative simplicity. Given our status as a compact operation specializing in the production of sauces, dressings, and beverages, I humbly seek your guidance regarding the optimal certification avenue to pursue. Your expert counsel in this regard would be greatly appreciated.


  • 0

Brothbro

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 442 posts
  • 133 thanks
230
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Aimlessly browsing the internet

Posted 11 August 2023 - 06:24 PM

Considering that you're a co-packer, you should start by asking your customers what their preferences/requirements are. After that, are there any other firms you'd like to co-pack for as your business expands? Learning their requirements can set you up for success in the future.


  • 1

Thanked by 1 Member:

DaveK

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 12 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 11 August 2023 - 06:40 PM

Considering that you're a co-packer, you should start by asking your customers what their preferences/requirements are. After that, are there any other firms you'd like to co-pack for as your business expands? Learning their requirements can set you up for success in the future.

 

Presently, our existing clientele has not articulated any specific requirements. However, it's worth noting that we have encountered missed opportunities with potential collaborators aiming to distribute their products through platforms like Trader Joe's or Walmart. These instances occurred due to our lack of GFSI certification records, apart from a foundational GMP audit and local regulatory inspection reports.

Your suggestion appears to propose a sequential approach—securing the account before pursuing certification. This approach holds merit, yet it's been challenging for us to secure accounts without the requisite certification. The complex issue lies in the uncertainty surrounding the retail destinations of our potential clients' products. The diversity of retail landscapes makes it a daunting task to definitively select the most suitable certification pathway.

My initial perspective revolved around the notion that possessing at least one certification on record could potentially serve as a foundation for establishing a rapport with potential clients. This, in turn, could facilitate our entry into discussions and negotiations.
Considering the complexity of this situation, I would greatly appreciate your insights into the logic of this approach or any alternative strategies you might recommend, given your valuable perspective and experience.


  • 0

kfromNE

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,228 posts
  • 323 thanks
382
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Bicycling, reading, nutrition, trivia

Posted 11 August 2023 - 06:41 PM

This topic has been covered a lot in the forum. I would search through past posts. You should find your answer. 


  • 0

DaveK

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 12 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 11 August 2023 - 06:57 PM

Further more which certification agency would you recommended?  We have use AIB in the past for GMP audit.  Looking for the most economic outfit.


  • 0

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,108 posts
  • 1229 thanks
1,267
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Home now on Martha's Vineyard Island/Republic of these United States

Posted 11 August 2023 - 11:50 PM

For ease of setting up and implementation I'd go with SQF. Use IFSQN'S templates system and as to a good CB I'd contact Henrietta Comacho at CICS.


  • 1

All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

 

 

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC 

Consultants for SQF, ISO-certified payment systems, Non-GMO, BRC, IFS, Lodging, F&B

http://www.GlennOster.com  -- 774.563.6161

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Thanked by 2 Members:

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,632 posts
  • 1384 thanks
747
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 12 August 2023 - 05:14 AM

For ease of setting up and implementation I'd go with SQF. Use IFSQN'S templates system and as to a good CB I'd contact Henrietta Comacho at CICS.

 

Thank you for the recommendation Glenn. I would agree that SQF is more straightforward if you are not familiar with the BRCGS standard.

 

The IFSQN offer a choice of two SQF Food Packages:

 

SQF Implementation Package for Food Manufacturers - Edition 9 (2022 Update)

 

SQF (& FSMA) Implementation Package for Food Manufacturers - Edition 9

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


  • 1

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams - Live Webinar next Friday May 09, 2025

Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. 

Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 

Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages: 

:cheers: 

 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Live Webinar - Friday June 06, 2025 - Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here


Thanked by 1 Member:

DaveK

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 12 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 August 2023 - 02:11 PM

For ease of setting up and implementation I'd go with SQF. Use IFSQN'S templates system and as to a good CB I'd contact Henrietta Comacho at CICS.

 

Where can I find the template system?


  • 0

DaveK

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 12 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 August 2023 - 02:13 PM

Ahh i see it - the link that IFSQN Fellow posted.  :ejut:


  • 0

kingstudruler1

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,084 posts
  • 353 thanks
349
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 August 2023 - 05:16 PM   Best Answer

Having created both BRC and SQF compliant programs over the years, I would probably pick SQF for the following reasons.  However, there really isnt much difference.  Either one is fine.  

 

1.  You are located in the USA where SQF is more popular.  It seems like there are more options for auditors, training, employees with knowledge/ community support, etc.   

2.   in general, I find the standard to be less prescriptive.   That may be a benefit to you.   it may not.  

3.  Not all of the guidance docs are free from BRC.  

 

 

I have used several of the certification companies over the years.   I haven't had any serious issues with any of them.   Maybe I have been lucky.   I have recently had several audits quoted.   there didn't seem to be a lot of price difference between them.  


  • 1

eb2fee_785dceddab034fa1a30dd80c7e21f1d7~

    Twofishfs@gmail.com

 


Thanked by 1 Member:


Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users