Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Storage facility without third party audit

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Brittany_Gibson

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 05 December 2023 - 05:13 PM

Full details:

Facility info: We specialized in food processing chemicals and cleaning chemicals so secondary additives all low risk.

 

Due to insurance purposes we are being required to relocated all flammables and oxidizers out of our facility and many of these items are part of our scope and food chemical codex grade chemicals.

 

The 3rd party warehouse facility does not have a third party audit and is also not registered with the FDA. They do have a pest control company and a cleaning program, they have a security company and system and segregation capabilities.

 

 

I know I need to consider them as a Contract manufacturer but without the FDA registration would they even be able to do this for us?

 

Any advice is appreciated including the contract warehouse part. I am starting from scratch as we do not do any contract manufacturing at this time. Including example SOP’s and forms 😊 Thank you!

 



jfrey123

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 636 posts
  • 182 thanks
314
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sparks, NV

Posted 05 December 2023 - 06:16 PM

As your product is low risk, the third party warehouser doesn't have to be SQF certified.  But you must ensure they are abiding by SQF code (per SQF 2.3.3.2).

 

But the fact they're not registered is a huge no-go.  Bioterrorism Act of 2002 applies to every company "...engaged in manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding food for consumption in the United States..."  It also violates SQF code to engage with a third party distributor who isn't abiding by all regulations (per SQF 2.3.3.3).

 

Registration of Food Facilities and Other Submissions | FDA



kingstudruler1

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 856 posts
  • 293 thanks
259
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 05 December 2023 - 07:14 PM

As your product is low risk, the third party warehouser doesn't have to be SQF certified.  But you must ensure they are abiding by SQF code (per SQF 2.3.3.2).

 

But the fact they're not registered is a huge no-go.  Bioterrorism Act of 2002 applies to every company "...engaged in manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding food for consumption in the United States..."  It also violates SQF code to engage with a third party distributor who isn't abiding by all regulations (per SQF 2.3.3.3).

 

Registration of Food Facilities and Other Submissions | FDA

 

I agree with Jfrey's comments.   


eb2fee_785dceddab034fa1a30dd80c7e21f1d7~

    Twofishfs@gmail.com

 


Scotty_SQF

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 377 posts
  • 90 thanks
147
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:hiking, gravel biking, exploring the great outdoors

Posted 06 December 2023 - 11:59 AM

Am I missing something or did the original poster say they produce food processing chemicals and cleaning chemicals?  If that is truly the case how is the 3rd party site in violation for not being registered as it is not a food facility?  The site would just be storing flammable chemicals for them.



jfrey123

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 636 posts
  • 182 thanks
314
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sparks, NV

Posted 06 December 2023 - 05:32 PM

@Scotty_SQF, op stated the food processing chemicals are "secondary additives", so I'm taking that to mean a chemical ingredient for a finished product. 

 

If I'm wrong on that and it's all just food grade cleaners/sanitizers, I think that would make a non-registered facility okay.  I'd still want to audit their facility to ensure it has pest control and some type of defense program in place to meet SQF's requirement on 3PL's, but it should be clear from the registration standpoint described in CFR's.





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users