Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Specific Migration testing and the alternative - screening method

Share this

Best Answer , 27 March 2024 - 09:00 AM

Greetings Purity,

 

As per the regulation (Annex III) concerning specific migration, your supplier should test with D2. In the same Annex, just above Table 2 and elsewhere in the regulation you can find exception cases (omitting the analysis for specific migration) if certain conditions are met, so maybe that is why you may see in some certificates only overall.

 

Screening is used when the composition of the material or sample is unknown. The screening analysis gives information about the migrating components. It is also a good tool for detection of non-intentionally added substances.

 

Regards!


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

Purity H

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 22 March 2024 - 02:21 PM

Hi,

I have been trying to understand specific migration testing.  In Regulation (EU) No 10/2011, Annex V chapter 2, there is mention of screening approaches (paragraph 2.2).  It says specific migration can be replaced with overall migration. The approach is to test at conditions as severe as specific migration testing.  I have a couple of questions:

 

1. How is screening done?  Since it sounds like it is not analysis of the compounds?

2. On some migration certificates,  I see Overall migration where there is some migration detected but less than the overall migration limit, but there is no specific migration looking at the specific compounds since some of them have very low SMLs.  Is this acceptable?

 

2. For my packaging of interest, it is used for oil for instance.  The packaging manufacturer does overall migration with the right simulant (D2, Isooctane, Ethanol 95%).  When it comes to specific migration, they only test with acetic acid.  I am concerned because they don't have specific migration using D2 or equivalent.  

 

I have looked at Regulation 10/2011 and I still don't have clarity on specific migration testing requirements for simulants and when screening is permitted and how is screening done.

 

Thanks,

Purity


  • 0

Evans X.

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 331 posts
  • 159 thanks
117
Excellent

  • Greece
    Greece
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Food safety, Lab quality, Reading, Online&board gaming, Movies&series, Basketball.

Posted 27 March 2024 - 09:00 AM   Best Answer

Greetings Purity,

 

As per the regulation (Annex III) concerning specific migration, your supplier should test with D2. In the same Annex, just above Table 2 and elsewhere in the regulation you can find exception cases (omitting the analysis for specific migration) if certain conditions are met, so maybe that is why you may see in some certificates only overall.

 

Screening is used when the composition of the material or sample is unknown. The screening analysis gives information about the migrating components. It is also a good tool for detection of non-intentionally added substances.

 

Regards!


  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:

Dorothy87

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 345 posts
  • 90 thanks
109
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:York
  • Interests:Antiques, Art, Sailing

Posted 27 March 2024 - 09:22 AM

 Hi ;)

 

I found this document quite useful. 

 

See attachment 


  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:

Purity H

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 07 March 2025 - 03:59 PM

Thanks Evans and Dorothy. 

Thank you for your responses.

 

Is acetic acid considered the worst case scenario when carrying out Specific Migration testing?  Most of the migration testing I am seeing, specific migration is only done for heavy metals and amines and the simulant used is acetic acid.  This packaging is for packing oil and the supplier knows this, yet they submit specific migration only done with acetic acid.

 

What I am struggling with is, if they think specific migration testing is necessary:

 

1. Why don't they use D2 as a simulant? In the DoC they declare packaging is suitable for all types of products including oil.

2. Why do they test SML for heavy metals and amines, and not the substances used to manufacture the packaging?

 

Sorry, I am struggling with this and suppliers are not giving me an answer. I am thinking primarily because migration testing labs advice them.


  • 0



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users