Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Scale Calibrations

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Stacys

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 34 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 04 April 2024 - 11:29 AM

Good Morning,

 

We are a food manufacturing plant, we have our scales calibrated annually by the state and we have a QA Tech that does them monthly. 

The production teams uses them continuously throughout the day, the subject came up that we should have weights on the lines and they should do them each morning.

 

Can anyone give me there thoughts on this please and thank you 

 

Stacy Surine


Edited by Stacys, 04 April 2024 - 11:33 AM.


MDaleDDF

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 528 posts
  • 209 thanks
406
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2024 - 11:40 AM

Every Friday I walk around with a weight and check every scale in the building and sign off that they're within a stated tolerance.  The guys in production do have a weight that they use whenever they see fit, but it's not recorded anywhere.

 

I guess it depends on how much risk you think there is that a scale will be off.   in 15 years, I've had a scale damaged once, and it didn't a test weight to tell me it was off, so to me the risk is quite low, but it depends on your place and what you make, etc.   There's usually not a one size fits all answer to anything in the food safety realm. 

 

But if you want to add a line to your preop and say they tested the scales, and they sign off on it each day, it certainly won't hurt anything, and is one more layer of coverage.  Which is good.   Most everything in my place has a redundancy as well.



acarver

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 40 posts
  • 5 thanks
4
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Georgia

Posted 04 April 2024 - 11:40 AM

When QA checks scales monthly, are they ever off? I do mine monthly and rarely are they out of calibration, and even then not to the point of product being out of specification. So, in my case, I leave it at monthly.

 

Leaving tested, certified weights out at workstations could open the possibility of them being damaged, which I definitely would not want to happen. 



G M

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 532 posts
  • 102 thanks
141
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2024 - 03:00 PM

Good Morning,

 

We are a food manufacturing plant, we have our scales calibrated annually by the state and we have a QA Tech that does them monthly. 

The production teams uses them continuously throughout the day, the subject came up that we should have weights on the lines and they should do them each morning.

 

Can anyone give me there thoughts on this please and thank you 

 

Stacy Surine

 

 

We use a variety of scales, with most on an annual calibration and irregular verification, with it being rare for them to need adjustment the risk is low.  However, the big scales that are most roughly treated get a daily verification by the maintenance team when equipment in the room is reassembled after cleaning.

 

Verification frequency is relative to how likely they are to be out of range, and the risks that causes.



jfrey123

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 639 posts
  • 182 thanks
314
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sparks, NV

Posted 04 April 2024 - 05:37 PM

I always shoot for annual calibration of our scales and our test weights, and then daily/shift change verification that scales are accurate.  It can be a line on a pre-op form for the operator to show what weight they used on what scale number to verify it is within spec.  I hate the idea of letting the plant run multiple days with an inaccurate scale, the traceability would be difficult to prove if it came down to it.  Then scales can be placed on hold and repaired/recalibrated by the contractor as needed when found to be out of spec.





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users