Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Can Non-Conformities from Internal Audits Be Addressed Without CAPAs?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

kconf

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 337 posts
  • 33 thanks
64
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 25 October 2024 - 03:33 PM

Hey all,

 

Just a quick simple question - Can the NC's received from internal audits be addressed without CAPA's?  


  • 0

nwilson

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 218 posts
  • 75 thanks
98
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bay Area, CA

Posted 25 October 2024 - 04:02 PM

For an internal audit any NC raised is an immediate CAPA (especially if gauging your site against a standard).  For general GMP Inspections any findings are addressed at the time of the finding (corrected on the spot), however still documented for trending purposes.  When I perform internal audits I try to put my auditor hat on and even if I know the process I make staff walk me through it to gauge their knowledge.  Any objective evidence that is not up to scratch is collected and if it is raised to a NC then this aids in continuous improvement.  


  • 0

jfrey123

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 895 posts
  • 235 thanks
457
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sparks, NV

Posted 25 October 2024 - 04:19 PM

From your own internal audits?  Yes, depending on the nature and severity of the finding. 

 

Any finding that is a clear hazard to food safety or a symptom of a program failure should receive a full CAPA with root cause investigation.  But minor findings related to GMP issues, documentation issues, minor building maintenance issues, etc., can get a CA on the spot and move on.  Though all of your minor CA's should still be trended, and there should be a point where those trends can trigger a full CAPA.  Example that if a GMP audit repeatedly finds employees wearing nail polish or ear buds or something, in addition to observations of those behaviors between your monthly audits, then a full CAPA could help you discover why GMP's are not being followed: more training required?  Is a supervisor telling employees they don't care about it? 

 

Or maybe a forklift punches a hole in the wall, found during the routine facility audit.  I'd mark it and write a work order to repair and call it solved.  But if I keep finding forklift holes in the wall, then I'm going full CAPA to figure out what the hell is happening and determine if maybe some type of barriers should be installed in areas.


  • 0

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,563 posts
  • 1361 thanks
735
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 26 October 2024 - 04:15 AM

Hi kconf

 

Attached File  Corrections CA & PA.png   1.19MB   2 downloads

 

Non-conformances identified in internal audits may be addressed in one of two ways:

1. Correct the problem by implementing a solution and documenting both the problem and the solution. This is known as correction.

2. Corrective action.

 

Preventive action is used to prevent a potential NC.

 

Regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations Webinar - Friday December 06, 2024 - Now available via the webinar recording

Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 

Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages: IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification




Share this


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users