Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Cleaning validation for chemical risks

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

qualitymanager

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 45 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • France
    France

Posted 17 November 2024 - 09:13 PM

Hello,

 

We are conducting cleaning validation and we have 3 risks: allergen, bacterias, chemicals.

 

The methods of analysis that we will follow for Allergen is Elisa and but we don't know what to use for the other risks (chemical and microbiological).

 

Based in the analysis of the food surface contact there is no pathogens (salmonella, E.coli, Listeria) but we have moulds yeasts, enterobacteriae.

 

For chemicals the mains issue is the cleaning product that could remain after cleaning.

 

How to validate that the cleaning is efficient and there is no traces of detergents?

 

Could we consider lubricant also as a risk and we should remove it after the cleaning? all our lubricants are food contact

 

 

 

Thanks

 


  • 0

Dorothy87

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 345 posts
  • 90 thanks
109
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:York
  • Interests:Antiques, Art, Sailing

Posted 18 November 2024 - 09:20 AM

Hi ;) 

 

you can use ATP test ;) 

 

What is an ATP Hygiena swab? | ATP Hygiene Monitoring |


  • 0

qualitymanager

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 45 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • France
    France

Posted 18 November 2024 - 06:35 PM

It's acceptable for the validation?

 

i think that only the quantitaive test methods can be used for the validation of the cleaning

 

ATP is for verification
 


  • 0

PrplomSolved

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 66 posts
  • 2 thanks
14
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Athens, GA

Posted 18 November 2024 - 07:28 PM

Hello,

 

We are conducting cleaning validation and we have 3 risks: allergen, bacterias, chemicals.

 

The methods of analysis that we will follow for Allergen is Elisa and but we don't know what to use for the other risks (chemical and microbiological).

 

Based in the analysis of the food surface contact there is no pathogens (salmonella, E.coli, Listeria) but we have moulds yeasts, enterobacteriae.

 

For chemicals the mains issue is the cleaning product that could remain after cleaning.

 

How to validate that the cleaning is efficient and there is no traces of detergents?

 

Could we consider lubricant also as a risk and we should remove it after the cleaning? all our lubricants are food contact

 

 

 

Thanks

 

Your micro could easily be completed through various rapid methods, the easiest being a product like Petrifilm. Indicators like EB's and APC's in addition to your Rapid Yeast/Mold (RYM) petrifilm would be adequate. If this is not as robust as you would like, maybe run traditional PCR or LAMP technologies in addition to the plating. 


  • 0

Austin N.

Principal Laboratory Technician 

AEMTEK Athens


G M

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 882 posts
  • 177 thanks
281
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 November 2024 - 07:52 PM

...

For chemicals the mains issue is the cleaning product that could remain after cleaning.

 

...

 

Most commercial chemical supply companies will also sell kits or strips to verify or validate your cleaning procedures, often by detecting trace residue of the active ingredients in the detergent or sanitizer.


  • 1



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users