Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Is this cooked ham product medium risk or low risk?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic
- - - - -

FoodSafetyAPP

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 53 posts
  • 8 thanks
13
Good

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 14 January 2025 - 09:31 AM

Hi all. 

 

After some advice please. 

 

We have a factory that is producing cooked ham. It is cooked, chilled, sliced, packed.

 

High risk area for post-cooking is a completely segregated, chilled area. Product is sliced, MAP packed and through the wall into boxing and palletising. 

 

My question is - once the product is through the wall into boxing and palletising, is this medium risk or low risk? 

 

And then once through to another segregated room for storage/dispatch, is this medium risk or low risk?

 

All rooms are chilled. 

 

Slight caveat - staff have to walk through storage/dispatch to enter the boxing and palletising area. 

 

Also - what would you suggest for product that enters the boxing/palletising room through the wall that then needs rework?

 

Thanks in advance. 

 

 


  • 0

jfrey123

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,069 posts
  • 282 thanks
522
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sparks, NV

Posted 14 January 2025 - 05:03 PM

Without seeing an operation in person, my gut would lean towards everything outside of the production area to be low risk but acknowledging the storage/palletizing areas need a control on the temperature.  With the finished goods being sealed in packaging, generally I would have no concerns about foot traffic through the storage area to reach the boxing/palletizing area.

 

Rework could be tricky once it left into final packages.  I'm guessing you're not talking about recooking the pork, you're mainly looking at repacking into different sized packages.  I'd want to avoid it re-entering the line where raw pork enters prior to cooking, unless you could possibly do it via sequencing: when rework needs to occur, schedule the rework at beginning of a shift or immediately post-cleaning prior to starting on fresh raw pork batches to avoid contaminating your already cooked rework.


  • 0

FoodSafetyAPP

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 53 posts
  • 8 thanks
13
Good

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 15 January 2025 - 08:38 AM

Hi, 

 

Thanks for the reply. 

 

Yes I would agree - I am unsure what makes it medium risk. 

 

Rework would not go back into the area of raw pork, it would simply go back into the high risk slicing/packing room so all product is cooked - is it ok to have product come into the boxing and palletising area where the packaging has failed for example not sealed properly, and then go back into the high risk room to be repacked?


  • 0

jfrey123

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,069 posts
  • 282 thanks
522
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sparks, NV

Posted 15 January 2025 - 05:17 PM

For a failed sealing of packages, I think you'd need a risk assessment with some pretty strong evidence to support.  A straight yes/no isn't possible here due to a number of variables that come to my mind: open exposure to an uncontrolled room/gas control lost; amount of time product was in palletizing/storage area prior to recognizing this issue; potential for FM contamination or micro risk from secondary packaging; evaluate risk based on how active your pest control traps are; etc.  I'm realizing I equated your cooked ham to RTE, but I'm not sure if you're producing it as RTE or still include a cook requirement on your finished label, as that could probably play another factor.

 

One thing for sure, anything deemed acceptable for rework I'd want done at the end of a primary production run to better control the risk that rework could contaminate the line during primary processing.  Possible reasons for rework should each be risk evaluated individually: simply changing packaging sizes/packaging type presents different hazards than bad seals on the packaging as an example.


  • 0

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,663 posts
  • 1387 thanks
752
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 16 January 2025 - 04:24 AM

Hi FoodSafetyAPP,

 

Once a product is enclosed e.g. in a sealed package then it becomes low risk although any applicable food safety conditions such as refrigeration need to be maintained.

 

So rooms for boxing/palletising and for storage/dispatch are low risk areas

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony

 

 


  • 0

Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Live Webinar - Friday June 06, 2025 - Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams - Available via the previous webinar recording. 


GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,429 posts
  • 824 thanks
353
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 29 January 2025 - 09:12 AM

I think you're asking if the area is low risk?  The product is, once cooked, a "high risk food" and has been implicated in deaths in the past through poor controls.  The area it passes into once packed is a low risk area providing this is completely segregated from high risk with separate entrances, PPE, walls etc.  

 

Everything once it's packed and through into a segregated area is low risk.  I see no benefit in having segregation for storage or despatch unless you're suggesting you need different workwear there but the access route makes that difficult.

 

Not sure if you mean the rework needs to be completely reopened?  I.e. in high risk?  I have to admit to hating this.  It's obviously needed from time to time but it should be part of your barrier risk assessment.

 

Controls I'd have in place:

  • Returns should be minimised as much as possible.  This is a prime area for a bit of lean work.  Get your CI team on board and remind them that "defects" was one of the wastes identified in the TPS.
  • No open packs should be returned, they need to be disposed of.
  • Make sure the ham is effectively chilled while waiting to be returned.
  • It should be sanitised back into the high risk area.
  • Traceability should be maintained.
  • It should be carefully opened to not introduce foreign matter or microbiological contamination.
  • If it's only 1-2 packs a shift, consider if it's worth the effort.

  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.




Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users