Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

FDA 3300 refusal charge

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic
- - - - -

sanidadexterior

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 51 posts
  • 6 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Murcia
  • Interests:contact : 10.3173@gmx.es

Posted Yesterday, 12:09 PM

According to the FDA, a food rejected under reason 3300: "The label fails to declare all major food allergens present in the product, as required by section 403(w)(1)." 403(w) 801(a)(3)

Is a misbranded food. Consumption of a food containing an allergen by a consumer sensitive to that allergen can be very dangerous.

Sometimes the presence of allergens goes unnoticed by the FBO due to cross-contamination or their presence in raw materials, making it difficult to identify their presence on the final product label.

Should a food whose label does not list the presence of a particular allergen be considered a misbranded or adulterated food?

 


  • 0

Slab

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 454 posts
  • 216 thanks
109
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Lonely High Steppe
  • Interests:Reading (history, science fiction), Photography, drawing,food safety, metrology, TQM, hoplology, etc.

Posted Yesterday, 01:33 PM

If the product is formulated as such, then yes it is misbranded. If it is a food previously denied admission by the FDA as "reoffer" without correction, then it is adulterated. 


  • 0

Food Safety News  

 

"Some people freak out when they see small vertebra in their pasta" ~ Chef John


Thanked by 1 Member:


Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users