Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

ICE Raids-Anyone update existing regulatory inspection PnP?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

kconf

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 366 posts
  • 35 thanks
72
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 11 June 2025 - 06:56 PM

Now I get it. So you were viewing ICE team as a mock crisis scenario.


  • 1

TimG

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 865 posts
  • 227 thanks
418
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 11 June 2025 - 06:58 PM

Now I get it. So you were viewing ICE team as a mock crisis scenario.

Specifically, the impact to food safety a regulatory visit/inspection of that magnitude could have.


Edited by TimG, 11 June 2025 - 06:59 PM.

  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,635 posts
  • 849 thanks
410
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 11 June 2025 - 07:26 PM

Now I get it. So you were viewing ICE team as a mock crisis scenario.

 

Sensible to do.  Possible ICE enforcement agents marching into your plant ignoring rules.  Potential for key staff loss even if it's in error, that's likely to cause disruption.  Even before that, you may have concern even from legal employees that they could be caught up in error and may choose to leave.  Then the added stresses of the situation that's going on impacts peoples performance etc.  So there is an acute crisis to do a simulation on but potentially while unintended, a slow burn of risk which is already happening.  While not the same and far less aggressively implemented, Brexit had a huge impact on UK food industry in terms of the quality and availability of staff.  


  • 3

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


G M

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 929 posts
  • 181 thanks
305
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 June 2025 - 10:00 PM

Sensible to do.  Possible ICE enforcement agents marching into your plant ignoring rules.  Potential for key staff loss even if it's in error, that's likely to cause disruption.  ...

 

More broadly there are government agencies that will have the authority to enter a property for jurisdictional reasons and potentially disregard our well considered food safety protocols for more eminent threats, whether that be in search of physical material or people. Drugs get hidden in things to attempt to circumvent detection, junior cyber criminals need day jobs, etc.  Plenty of things can be the cause, and several agencies have enforcement powers.


  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,635 posts
  • 849 thanks
410
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 12 June 2025 - 03:46 AM

More broadly there are government agencies that will have the authority to enter a property for jurisdictional reasons and potentially disregard our well considered food safety protocols for more eminent threats, whether that be in search of physical material or people. Drugs get hidden in things to attempt to circumvent detection, junior cyber criminals need day jobs, etc.  Plenty of things can be the cause, and several agencies have enforcement powers.

 

Yep but it's SUCH a different mindset US vs UK.  I have always had this in my procedures around access in emergencies.  The mindset though in the UK is "that's likely to be an ambulance if there was an accident or someone had a heart attack" etc.  The mindset in the US is very different on who those official agency staff might be employed by.

 

A few years back, I was at a site where an awful case happened with modern slavery.  That's been my closest link with talking to police about something like this (albeit they had the right to work in the UK, they were being abused by a criminal gang sadly).  No blue lights, no charging in, just informing us at the time (as the person had by that point left) and talking to us about our controls against modern slavery.  Not in an accusing way, more about whether we were doing everything we could.  

 

It must be a stressful experience planning for all of this.  


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


TimG

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 865 posts
  • 227 thanks
418
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 13 June 2025 - 01:03 PM

 

 

It must be a stressful experience planning for all of this.  

Nah, not really. I don't overthink it. Just enough to a) do our best to make sure the food is still safe b) show an auditor we did all we could to make sure the food was safe. 

The first few times at the sugar bagging plant when the folks in the black SUV's showed up it was kind of 'exciting.' I have always been a bit heavy on 'righteous indignation,' especially if I think food I'm keeping safe is at risk. Was hard to sit there and keep my mouth shut as they stormed through and I was watching the cameras. I remember the plant manager saying to me "Tim, uhh..maybe don't even talk to them. You have a problem with authority, and they have a lot of authority." 


  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,635 posts
  • 849 thanks
410
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 14 June 2025 - 04:30 AM

"Tim, uhh..maybe don't even talk to them. You have a problem with authority, and they have a lot of authority." 

 

Not just me then?  Is it a Technical trait?  Actually it's very much a British trait, we are not rule followers if the rules don't make sense on an individual basis, are you sure you're not an honorary Brit?

 

The stress is more I was thinking of the people who might have the right to stay who now might suddenly leave out of fear and then the good people you do lose through a raid like this.

 

It all looks very authoritarian from this side of the pond.  While Brits sometimes have more in common with the US than much of Europe this feels a bit bizarre and is making even the most Eurosceptic Brit (which I'm not) doff a beret and gilet jaune, grab a croissant and say "bof!"


  • 1

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


MDaleDDF

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 769 posts
  • 252 thanks
557
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 June 2025 - 06:08 PM

No I am using the word correctly as they had to legal precedent that allows them to apprehend an individual that is currently at a courthouse, going through the legal process, because her lawyer had to use the restroom. Just because they are federal officers does not mean they have the authority to apprehend (abduct) people without due process. Additionally, if you are pointing at 1325, 1326 specifically a visa overstayer is LEGALLY distinct as those codes cover (1325) people caught coming over the border (misdemeanor) and (1326) those reentering the country post removal (felony). (my point about it being ruled as unconstitutional is that looking at things simply as legal vs illegal is a fault as the law isn't always a just system. Just because something is lawful doesn't mean it is moral and vice versa)

 

This has nothing to do with morals, or your feelings, and EVERYTHING to do with the law, which IS a system.   If you're in the country illegally, you should expect to be removed, just as I would personally if I was in Switzerland illegally, Canada illegally, or anywhere else illegally.....   

If you want to enter a country, ANY country, you either do it legally, or you are subject to the laws thereof.   It really is that simple.

And as far as legal precedent, I'll defer to a lawyer or officer, not a food scientist.....   "Due Process:  due process refers to the legal requirement that the government provide fair and impartial procedures before depriving someone of their life, liberty, or property. For undocumented immigrants, this means they are entitled to certain legal protections, such as being informed of the charges against them, the right to a hearing, and the opportunity to present evidence in their defense."   

 

Saying federal agents are abducting people is laughable.   Abduction = kidnapping, pretty much.   That's not at ALL what's happening.   When you get a DUI and the cops take you away, are you being 'abducted'?   No.

I applaud your will to want good for everyone, genuinely I do.   But the law is the law, and no nation has porous borders.    You want in, come in legally.   You want to work here, get a work permit or proper visa.   That's the law.   


  • 1

Seathalos

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 5 thanks
36
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 20 June 2025 - 06:47 PM

And as far as legal precedent, I'll defer to a lawyer or officer, not a food scientist.....   "Due Process:  due process refers to the legal requirement that the government provide fair and impartial procedures before depriving someone of their life, liberty, or property. For undocumented immigrants, this means they are entitled to certain legal protections, such as being informed of the charges against them, the right to a hearing, and the opportunity to present evidence in their defense."   

 

Saying federal agents are abducting people is laughable.   Abduction = kidnapping, pretty much.   That's not at ALL what's happening.   When you get a DUI and the cops take you away, are you being 'abducted'?   No.

I applaud your will to want good for everyone, genuinely I do.   But the law is the law, and no nation has porous borders.    You want in, come in legally.   You want to work here, get a work permit or proper visa.   That's the law.   

 

Yes immigrants are entitled to Due Process. But that is why these deportations are being criticized as the admin is deporting people without said Due Process. And if one person does not have Due Process no one does. Honestly is one of the best parts of the US is having rights like Due Process enshrined.

 

Yes I understand what the word abducted means. I used it purposefully as the instance I was talking about was A PERSON GOING THROUGH THE LEGAL PROCESS THAT WAS TAKEN FROM A COURTHOUSE WHILE HER LAWYER WAS IN THE BATHROOM. She was there to progress through the system of immigration. In all reality the issue of undocumented immigrants really stems more from not having the proper resources to have these people documented in a timely fashion, which is unfortunately designed that way for a myriad or reasons. I am a person that uses words deliberately, as if they are used too often or liberally they lose all actual meaning. 

 

Many horrible things were legal under US and many other countries Law throughout their history, and just accepting something simply because it is the Law isn't something I can really do as personally all laws should be justified. Many things that are happening are very similar to how things were done in the Gilded Age, I would rather not have to repeat those issues again.

 

But on the original question: Make sure that your employees know that just because they are in Uniform does not mean they are allowed to disregard the Regulations and Laws that we in the food industry have in place, that it may be unlikely but is it something that can potentially happen and that they should inform upper management ASAP. They have to check in, follow protocols and GMPs like anyone else and just because they are Feds does not mean they get any special privileges.  


  • 2

TimG

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 865 posts
  • 227 thanks
418
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 23 June 2025 - 04:32 PM

But on the original question: Make sure that your employees know that just because they are in Uniform does not mean they are allowed to disregard the Regulations and Laws that we in the food industry have in place, that it may be unlikely but is it something that can potentially happen and that they should inform upper management ASAP. They have to check in, follow protocols and GMPs like anyone else and just because they are Feds does not mean they get any special privileges.  

 

No, in quite a few instances they are both allowed to and do disregard food laws, including FDA's cGMP. I've seen it especially (several times a year) on port occupied locations with ATF or PA. If any manager decides he's going to block entry of ATF to a port facility until GMP's are satisfied I sure hope they've run that by the owner. And also has a few days free to sit in a holding cell.

I have run the Ice scenario by the owner, and we're cooperating fully.


  • 0

G M

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 929 posts
  • 181 thanks
305
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 June 2025 - 07:09 PM

 

But on the original question: Make sure that your employees know that just because they are in Uniform does not mean they are allowed to disregard the Regulations and Laws that we in the food industry have in place, that it may be unlikely but is it something that can potentially happen and that they should inform upper management ASAP. They have to check in, follow protocols and GMPs like anyone else and just because they are Feds does not mean they get any special privileges.  

 

No, in quite a few instances they are both allowed to and do disregard food laws, including FDA's cGMP. I've seen it especially (several times a year) on port occupied locations with ATF or PA. If any manager decides he's going to block entry of ATF to a port facility until GMP's are satisfied I sure hope they've run that by the owner. And also has a few days free to sit in a holding cell.

I have run the Ice scenario by the owner, and we're cooperating fully.

 

 

 

What is the judicial standard for "reasonable and necessary" when it comes to property damage during a search?  Anyone familiar with a court ruling for a food company that had big losses because of a raid and tried to get compensated?

 

How much do standard insurance policies cover the losses associated with a warrant being executed?  I've dealt with utilities problems related claims, but not governmental immunity related claims.


  • 0

Seathalos

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 5 thanks
36
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 23 June 2025 - 07:42 PM

 

But on the original question: Make sure that your employees know that just because they are in Uniform does not mean they are allowed to disregard the Regulations and Laws that we in the food industry have in place, that it may be unlikely but is it something that can potentially happen and that they should inform upper management ASAP. They have to check in, follow protocols and GMPs like anyone else and just because they are Feds does not mean they get any special privileges.  

 

No, in quite a few instances they are both allowed to and do disregard food laws, including FDA's cGMP. I've seen it especially (several times a year) on port occupied locations with ATF or PA. If any manager decides he's going to block entry of ATF to a port facility until GMP's are satisfied I sure hope they've run that by the owner. And also has a few days free to sit in a holding cell.

I have run the Ice scenario by the owner, and we're cooperating fully.

 

 

Port Occupied locations are technically under different jurisdictions, without a warrant they can ONLY go to places that are open to the public. And with the amount of "vigilantes" pretending to be ICE officers on the rise we should not just assume that everyone coming into the facility is an actual agent. And if I get detained because I asked a public servant for identification, it is our right under the 4th amendment an important one at that and one worth pushing back over. And in all reality them signing in will not decrease the efficacy of their raid and working with the employer ahead of time would more than like increase it. 

 

Being put in a cell because I invoked the rights provided to my by the constitution is far better than allowing them to be infringed upon 


  • 0

Seathalos

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 5 thanks
36
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 26 June 2025 - 04:56 PM

Found some resources describing the rights of employers if ICE comes to the facility. A great resource for those working on setting up a plan of action (as we all should). 

 

Big take away is ICE cannot enter non-public areas without permission or a JUDICAL warrant (not one signed by an ICE administrator like they have been trying to use) 

 

Attached File  EmployerGuide-NELP-NILC-2017-07.pdf   11.82MB   5 downloads


  • 1

AZuzack

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 22 thanks
16
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 27 June 2025 - 02:25 PM

I found the same guide that was just posted above.  

 

In response the comment that law abiding immigrants and citizens have nothing to fear:  The U.S. has a very long history of ignoring the legal status of non-white individuals whether it was re-enslaving a free person of color or sending citizens of Japanese ancestry to detention camps in WWII.  Our history, and our current political climate is more than enough to make any non-white immigrant nervous.  

 

In response to the judgement passed on the employers: I've stated this on another thread but our rural area, our farms do NOT have internet access.  Yeah, some do.  But we have a lot of areas that do not and a lot of areas that have really crappy access.  A Farm without internet is not accessing a database to verify workers.  They aren't paying workers electronically.  They aren't posting jobs on job boards.  There isn't a plethora of poor city folk looking to travel 50miles to perform physical labor in the sun for 12hr shifts.  Farmers are hiring the available labor.  Not because it's cheaper but because that's what is available.  


  • 2

Seathalos

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 5 thanks
36
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 27 June 2025 - 02:42 PM

In response the comment that law abiding immigrants and citizens have nothing to fear:  The U.S. has a very long history of ignoring the legal status of non-white individuals whether it was re-enslaving a free person of color or sending citizens of Japanese ancestry to detention camps in WWII.  Our history, and our current political climate is more than enough to make any non-white immigrant nervous.  

 

Yep, it is an unfortunate stain on our record. Especially jarring is the treatment of migrants in Texas during the 1920's. Forcibly washing them with a mixture of kerosene and vinegar, clothes and shoes treated in cyanogen gas and then when finally "disinfected" they were showered with hoses using a mixture of soap chips and kerosene oil because the US "believed" they were "dirty". Absolute disgusting and undignified treatment of human beings. 

 

We should learn from our history and make sure we do our best to not allow the horrors to be repeated. 


  • 1

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,635 posts
  • 849 thanks
410
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 30 June 2025 - 06:23 AM

There's an even more recent example from the UK of the "Windrush" migrants.  People who came here from ex UK colonies in the Caribbean and were entitled to be here, suddenly were told in 2018 they were illegal.  Some were denied rights like NHS access, others were deported.  Under UK law, anyone who had arrived from a Commonwealth country before 1973 had the right to citizenship.  Only problem was the records of this had been destroyed and if the citizen had not been asked for proof in the meantime, they could not prove it themselves even though they thought themselves to be (and were) British.

 

https://en.wikipedia...indrush_scandal

 

Basically it was government incompetence which led to a generation of immigrants being wrongly termed illegal BECAUSE of the wider anti immigration sentiment of the time, 

 

This is how completely innocent people end up getting caught up in anti immigration rhetoric but it doesn't even have to be that extreme.  The fear of it can lead to people deciding to return to country of origin.  While there wasn't as much anti Eastern European sentiment in the UK, there was some and Brexit stoked that.  Some people just felt unwelcome and went home.

 

All of the above has a point and it had a HUGE impact on the food industry.  When I first started working in food three decades ago, there were few immigrants working in it but also chilled prepared foods were not a big thing.  The immigration in the 90s and 00s actually created the labour availability for a lot of these businesses to start or grow.  What then happened after 2019 when Brexit kicked in, accelerated by Covid of course is a lot of that labour availability dropped.  Some returned to home countries, people who wanted to travel now faced barriers and alternative markets for their labour within the EU seemed more attractive.

 

Fast forward and we are still feeling the impacts now.  While the number of people unemployed is still high, the brutal truth is, most Brits see working on a production line as beneath them.  It's hard work and while we have a reasonable minimum wage in the UK, it's not extravagant.  The immigrants we do now get are often coming here not just unable to speak English but often not able to read their own language.  Diversity of languages spoken in factories is now huge.  20+ used to be a lot.  Now 40, 60+ is not uncommon.  

 

This means for food safety, through these ICE raids in the US, you will lose illegal immigrants for sure but you will also lose some legal immigrants.  Both in the legal and illegal pools, you might lose some of your best workers.  If you can replace them, it might be with people from further afield who do not share your language, may not speak a word of it and may not be able to read.  Additionally because of the longer distances, you may not be able to recruit people with cultural similarities to you.  That can have influence on toileting habits (anyone who works in the food industry in the UK will know what I mean.)  

 

What problems is this causing?  Everything from I've had crap walked around by someone (literally).  I've had people who cannot easily be trained and struggle to prove their understanding if they are.  We've had shifts just not turn up for work.  We have had abuses where people who are in supervisory roles have been abusing their staff verbally and financially and other leaders were unaware.  There is just so much complexity which comes with it all. 

 

What can you do now?  If I was in the US I'd be urging urgent investment into automation.  You want to remove as many roles from your food factories as you can.  At the same time I'd be making sure all your ducks are in a row on your right to work checks but then offer legal support to anyone caught up in these issues (to reassure your key workers so they don't leave).  I'd also be looking to up pay and conditions now and do everything I could to bring in and retain staff.  As you automate more, the skills needed are going to be higher.  You REALLY need to retain your good people.  I'd even be looking to see if (on the quiet) I could help some of the workers you have get legal status.  I did the same in the UK with an employee who had a marital visa but was having to leave that relationship.  Not sure how that process works in the US but it was possible in the UK and we did it on the quiet.

 

All just suggestions but I think it's a huge set of mistakes that the UK made even just in economic terms not even considering ethical ones.  Just sharing so you guys may have some potential insight of where this could lead and the impacts on food safety of that potential end point.


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Seathalos

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 5 thanks
36
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 30 June 2025 - 01:18 PM

I'd even be looking to see if (on the quiet) I could help some of the workers you have get legal status.  I did the same in the UK with an employee who had a marital visa but was having to leave that relationship.  Not sure how that process works in the US but it was possible in the UK and we did it on the quiet.

 

In the US companies actually have the ability to sponsor their employees to get legal status. Unfortunately, I personally don't know many that have done it, could be because all fees would be covered by the employer. Option is there but idk if many would actually take it (as it most would treat it as just an extra "non profitable cost" seeing how many companies view these types of expenses)


  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,635 posts
  • 849 thanks
410
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 30 June 2025 - 02:05 PM

In the US companies actually have the ability to sponsor their employees to get legal status. Unfortunately, I personally don't know many that have done it, could be because all fees would be covered by the employer. Option is there but idk if many would actually take it (as it most would treat it as just an extra "non profitable cost" seeing how many companies view these types of expenses)

 

Might be worth them starting to suck up that cost.  You're going to start finding it hard to get decent staff really soon if not already.


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Seathalos

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 5 thanks
36
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 30 June 2025 - 02:10 PM

One would hope they would.


  • 0



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users