Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Metal Detection Procedure

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

Tahreem Mahmood

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 19 August 2025 - 06:48 PM

Hello Everyone, I am working as a Food Safety and Quality Assurance Coordinator. I was looking at the Metal Detection Procedures today and I find the SOP on Metal Detection procedures a bit unclear. 

Currently, they are testing one metal type at a time to check the sensitivity. For example, for spinach, they only run it against the Ferrous strip.

From my understanding, the product should be tested against Ferrous, Non-Ferrous, and Stainless Steel. Could you please help me confirm the correct process?

Thank you for your guidance.


  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,908 posts
  • 891 thanks
454
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 19 August 2025 - 08:04 PM

Yes, if it's a metal detector (not an x-ray) AND your packaging isn't metallic, then you should test Fe, Non Fe and SS.  But for foil packaging, some old applications have ferrous in foil metal detectors (so would only be testing Fe).  But it's a pretty old fashioned approach.  Most using packaging like that will have x-rays nowadays.

 

Apart from test piece choice there are also methods for testing metal detectors which have become a lot more onerous over my years in the food industry.  Let me know if you want more info on that.


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Thanked by 1 Member:

G M

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 971 posts
  • 191 thanks
321
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 August 2025 - 09:51 PM

You test what there is a reasonable level of risk of contamination for.  If they wrote a hazard analysis validation or other support for why they were only using one type of seed it might make sense.

 

By default most sites will test stainless steel, brass, and ferrous steel because those are the most likely materials to contaminate the product, because that is what the processing machinery is made of.


  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,908 posts
  • 891 thanks
454
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 20 August 2025 - 07:31 AM

You test what there is a reasonable level of risk of contamination for.  If they wrote a hazard analysis validation or other support for why they were only using one type of seed it might make sense.

 

By default most sites will test stainless steel, brass, and ferrous steel because those are the most likely materials to contaminate the product, because that is what the processing machinery is made of.

 

Not quite for produce.  You should also be considering contamination having come in from the field and harvesting.  But I agree on production machinery, the vast majority of it nowadays should be stainless steel which is normally significantly harder to detect than Ferrous.  So I can never see the justification in not testing for Stainless Steel.

 

There is an argument that different metal types are less important for x-rays which work on density not magnetic field disturbance but not in metal detection to my understanding.

 

For those interested, whether you have a MT metal detector or not, this is a fantastic guide.  I used to have their earlier edition in hard copy.

 

Guide to Metal Detection Technology


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Thanked by 1 Member:


Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users