Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

On-Site Supplier Audits - are they necessary?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Jill Clark

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 40 posts
  • 1 thanks
2
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted Yesterday, 07:50 PM

Hello all!

 

How necessary is it to do on-site supplier audits?  The products we manufacture are very low risk, as are the raw ingredients we use.  We've never done an on-site audit for any of our vendors, so curious if this is something we should plan.  We have always done desk audits.  Previous auditors have mentioned it, but it hasn't been an issue and the code doesn't specifically call for on-site audits.   

 

Thanks!

 

Jill


  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,771 posts
  • 877 thanks
428
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted Yesterday, 08:13 PM

It would depend for me on the risk of the ingredient (which you've said is low) and whether they have a GFSI standard.  If neither then I would audit.  Even if it's low risk. 


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Jill Clark

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 40 posts
  • 1 thanks
2
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted Yesterday, 09:52 PM

It would depend for me on the risk of the ingredient (which you've said is low) and whether they have a GFSI standard.  If neither then I would audit.  Even if it's low risk. 

Thank you!  We have a few that aren't audited to the GFSI standard and those are the vendors I think we should be doing on-site audits.


  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,771 posts
  • 877 thanks
428
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 38 minutes ago

I think with many GFSI standards you can get away without a site audit for very low risk suppliers without GFSI but personally I don't see how any ingredient isn't a risk to your business and while GFSI isn't perfect, it does give you some level of assurance that at least the systems are in place.  

 

While it's food safety which is the main concern, there is a concept in UK law of "due diligence" which is drummed into food safety practitioners from day one.  The idea being that things do and will go wrong but under law if you can prove you've done what's reasonable, then you're not likely to be prosecuted.  A supplier without an independent audit on their food ingredient is making me think I'd not be duly diligent if I'd not audited or arranged an independent one.  Same with primary, food contact packaging. 


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,789 posts
  • 1421 thanks
782
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 7 minutes ago

Hi Jill,

 

Site audits aren’t always necessary or the best use of our time.

 

I think for low-risk suppliers, it is possible that a supplier questionnaire that contains relevant information for you to make an informed decision on whether to approve the supplier is sufficient.

 

My confidence in doing this would include supplier history and the amount of checks/monitoring being done on the incoming material.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 




Share this

3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users