Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

USDA Oversight Concerns at Small Jerky Facility

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic
- - - - -

irheavyd

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 0 thanks
3
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 06 November 2025 - 11:40 PM

I am the Assistant Manager of a small jerky and sausage manufacturing plant in Oregon.  I am curious as to how other facilities in this district are being treated.  I ask because are experiencing extreme over inspecting, retaliation NR's and suspensions, along with many many more issues with USDA. They have gotten a god complex and instead of ensuring we follow our plan, they have extended there self proclaimed authority way beyond what is regulatory requirements.  We have the same plant inspectors for  more than 5 years.  They have developed false friendships with people, hatred towards people (myself being there main focus because i push back and challenge them when they are not following there regulations.  We have received 93 NR's this year alone.  We have received a 90 percent from SQF and ODA has praised our facility.  Everyone that comes here gives nothing but positive feedback except for USDA.  I am wondering if other plants get this treatment.  We have one of the most complex HACCP systems around as we make over 100 different products with many variations in size and packaging of those 100 products.  We have 7 separate HACCP plans as well as many prerequisites.  Our SSOP is robust as well as our Listeria Control Program.       


  • 0

rjeronimus

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 07 November 2025 - 07:55 PM

Replying in an effort to follow this discussion thread. We recently acquired a well established line of enrichment broths for food safety screening (PDX, for listeria, salmonella, and STEC detection). While trying to connect with previous customers and critical consultants and learn more about our product application, I was told that USDA regulations changed and that testing had to be sent to outside labs. That would have a serious impact on companies being able to test onsite. We were unable to substantiate the response we received, but I am wondering if it is a trend or perhaps regional. The consultant and related customers also produced similar items - RTE meats, sausage, jerky, etc. - but in Florida. 


  • 0

kfromNE

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,299 posts
  • 331 thanks
416
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Bicycling, reading, nutrition, trivia

Posted 07 November 2025 - 08:09 PM

Not in the Oregon though it wouldn't be hard for you to figure out the other companies in your area then google them and ask them. 

Over the years, I've seen inspectors who are more difficult to work with. Who write more NRs than others. 

 

What were the NRs and suspensions regarding. What was the SQF auditor's opinion on the NRs. 


Edited by kfromNE, 07 November 2025 - 08:10 PM.

  • 0

G M

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 983 posts
  • 195 thanks
325
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 07:08 PM

The rate of NRs unfortunately has more to do with inspector personalities than it should.  We're in different districts, but overall I'd say our numbers are down compared to a year ago with different IIC stationed with some plants.


  • 0

irheavyd

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 0 thanks
3
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted Today, 06:25 PM

In-house testing is still allowed.  USDA is not permitted to add any new regulations at this time from what I know.  I think that was a presidential order.  USDA likes to pick on Facilities that do there own testing when i fact there testing procedures are the ones that should be put into question.  They use 3M testing methods.  The problem with what they do is the sponges they use for sampling come pre-moistened with the broth.  When they actually use the sponges, the broth only covers parts of the sponges and not the entire surface of the sponge.  


  • 0

irheavyd

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 74 posts
  • 0 thanks
3
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted Today, 06:28 PM

Unfortunately our inspectors have "god syndrome".  They retaliate any time you challenge them.  Over the years, due to pacifying them to avoid regulatory sanctions, they have progressively gotten farther and farther away from there own regulations and are basing everything on there personal interpretation of regulations and the plans we have written.   


  • 0

kfromNE

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,299 posts
  • 331 thanks
416
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Bicycling, reading, nutrition, trivia

Posted Today, 07:12 PM

Unfortunately our inspectors have "god syndrome".  They retaliate any time you challenge them.  Over the years, due to pacifying them to avoid regulatory sanctions, they have progressively gotten farther and farther away from there own regulations and are basing everything on there personal interpretation of regulations and the plans we have written.   

 

What about their district boss. To avoid some of the personal opinions of inspectors, we get questions answered from the district boss and/or from an expert at the local land grant university. Ask FSIS works well too. 

 

I use a bunch of scientific articles too. 


Edited by kfromNE, Today, 07:22 PM.

  • 0



Share this

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users